Synthetic diamonds and the Kimberly Process � fighting the last war

No Image

‘The moment the average divorcee finally becomes aware that diamonds are no longer rare, and can be made, as Karl Marx once famously said, ‘as cheap as bricks’, then the diamond ring she has in the jewellery box from her last failed marriage, which she believes is appreciating in value every year will suddenly hit the market and then we will all discover that diamonds are not forever’, writes PROFESSOR ROMAN GRYNBERG*


For a decade now the world has been engaged in what has been seen as a battle against blood diamonds i.e. diamonds that have been used to fund wars in countries like Sierra Leone, DRC and Angola. The Kimberly process, has been a unique but flawed example of an attempt at global co-operation by producers and consumers to stamp out blood diamonds. That the Kimberly process even succeeded in being established is because it was in just about everyone’s interest for it to do so. No-one in the diamond business needed these stones which are sold as symbols of love being associated with war and bloodshed. Moreover, the blessing of the World Trade Organisation and the UN to restrict the trade of blood diamond did much to help do what the De Beers cartel could no longer do in the 1990’s. Unfortunately not all went to plan as the Kimberly process did not come with a system of traceability.

Editor's Comment
‘Fake’ drugs: A matter of life, truth and accountability

When claims of such gravity are made, especially by a sitting Assistant Minister they cannot be brushed aside, delayed, or treated as routine political noise. Even the Ombudsman has confirmed receipt of a report from a political party and a review of these complaints is now underway. That is a necessary first step. But it is only the beginning. The seriousness of the allegations demands urgency, transparency and clarity. The public is entitled to...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up