Family battle for Kang bogosi

The controvesy surrounding the chieftancy of Kang village can be traced back to the 1930s and now the battle for the successor to the late Kgosi Church Pego Seipone (CP) is far from over as Omponye Pego and Basadi Seipone tug it out for the position.

The tension has now erupted between the son of the late Kgosi Motaung Pego, Omponye Pego who believes his father was the only chief ordained and wore a leopard skin in the long line of the Kang chieftaincy. As a result,  he believes  he is the right heir to the throne. On the other hand, Basadi Seipone who is the  daughter of the late CP seeks to be recognised as the heiress to the throne.  When contacted by Mmegi to confirm the allegations that she is in a tussle for the position with her cousin Omponye, Basadi was quick to give a response that she is not going to reveal to Mmegi anything as to whether she is interested in contesting for the chieftaincy or not. "If you want to know what is really happening you should have attended the past Kgotla meeting," Basadi said before hanging up the phone.

According to Omponye, despite the fact that there are those who want the throne, he has observed that their interference and interest does not entitle them to it. He said that Basadi Seipone,  was once told by the community some time ago during a Kgotla meeting that she was not the right heir.  This publication has also learnt that Pego Seipone, CP's father, was married to three women. His first wife didn't produce a male heir: his second wife is mother to a certain Omponye Motaung while Basadi Seipone is the late CP's daughter and the tug of war for the bogosi is between her and her paternal uncle, Omponye. In addition, Church did not want any of his children to rule as they are all women and he believed that a woman could never be a Kgosi in his father's land.

Editor's Comment
BPF should get house in order

Speaker of the National Assembly, Dithapelo Keorapetse, has this week rightly washed his hands of the mess, refusing to wade into a party squabble that has no clear leadership and no single version of the truth.When a single party sends six different letters to the Speaker’s office, each claiming to be the authoritative voice, it is not just confusion, but an embarrassment.Keorapetse is correct to insist on institutional boundaries. Parliament...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up