Mmegi

Africa and the need for alternative electoral justice

Over the past decade, Africa has witnessed a concerning rise in election disputes, significantly undermining the integrity of electoral processes. Recent elections in Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Zimbabwe, Kenya, Mozambique, and Tunisia have faced widespread criticism. These cases highlight a troubling pattern across Africa, where electoral disputes range from allegations of fraud and lack of transparency to outright manipulation.

In extreme instances, such as in Gabon and Niger, electoral discontent has even led to military coups, starkly illustrating the fragility of democratic institutions in the region.

These disputes are an inevitable by product of the intense competition for power in democratic systems. Candidates invest substantial resources and emotions into their campaigns, with incumbents fighting to retain their positions and challengers striving to unseat them. This charged atmosphere creates fertile ground for disagreements. When disputes arise, they often strike at the heart of democratic principles, such as the peaceful transfer of power and public trust in institutions, raising the stakes to extraordinary levels with potentially far-reaching consequences for the political landscape. Conflicts are not confined to a single moment but can arise throughout the entire election cycle. From pre-registration and campaigning to voting day and post-election phases, disputes can occur at any stage. Common flashpoints include disruptions during campaign periods, controversies over boundary delimitation, and irregularities in voter registration. Additionally, disputes often arise over candidate nominations, disagreements about voting procedures, and challenges to the acceptance of final results.

Editor's Comment
Micro-procurement maze demands urgent reform

Whilst celebrating milestones in inclusivity, with notably P5 billion awarded to vulnerable groups, the report sounds a 'siren' on a dangerous and growing trend: the ballooning use of micro-procurement. That this method, designed for small-scale, efficient purchases, now accounts for a staggering 25% (P8 billion) of total procurement value is not a sign of agility, but a 'red flag'. The PPRA’s warning is unequivocal and must be...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up