the monitor

Rakgare questions CAF

Concerned: Tumiso Rakgare. PIC: MORERI SEJAKGOMO
Concerned: Tumiso Rakgare. PIC: MORERI SEJAKGOMO

Minister of Youth, Gender, Sport and Culture, Tumiso Rakgare has questioned the decision by continental body, CAF to deny Botswana the rights to host AFCON 2027 stating that the decision was regressive.

The 2027 AFCON hosting rights were awarded to Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania's joint bid. “The voting that took place in Cairo was regressive,” Rakgare said during a press briefing on Friday. He said CAF was supposed to use the audit carried out by audit firm, Price Waterhouse and Coopers (PWC), to determine the bidding. “As Botswana we challenge anyone to show us a better bid book than ours for 2027 perhaps taking out Algeria who had withdrawn before the elections,” he said. The minister said they only learnt that CAF had resorted to voting only when they were in Cairo. “Once we were in Cairo, in the morning of the congress we learnt that CAF had now resorted to voting on the day of the announcement,” Rakgare.

He further said the impression they got on the day was that voting would be left to top ranked countries as per the PWC audit. “The decision by CAF to us was not good as the original idea but come election day, we learnt every bid country would have the opportunity to be voted for regardless of how they faired in the auditors’ report,” he said. Rakgare implored CAF to consider more progressive and transparent systems such as they had initially proposed and stop using secret ballot. “When we were in Ivory Coast where there were elections, voting was done in front of us and counting was also done openly and we knew how everyone performed,” Rakgare said.

Editor's Comment
Micro-procurement maze demands urgent reform

Whilst celebrating milestones in inclusivity, with notably P5 billion awarded to vulnerable groups, the report sounds a 'siren' on a dangerous and growing trend: the ballooning use of micro-procurement. That this method, designed for small-scale, efficient purchases, now accounts for a staggering 25% (P8 billion) of total procurement value is not a sign of agility, but a 'red flag'. The PPRA’s warning is unequivocal and must be...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up