Mmegi

Why Botswana journalists cannot ignore their country’s digital future

Thomas Nkhoma. PIC KENNEDY RAMOKONE
Thomas Nkhoma. PIC KENNEDY RAMOKONE

The promise of access, the peril of surveillance, the duty of protection - these define our digital era. For Botswana, the choice is between open democracy or digital silence, writes THOMAS THOS NKHOMA*

When Parliament passed the Access to Information Act in 2024, it was hailed as a milestone for democracy. At long last, people said, there was a legal framework to demand information that for years had been locked away in dusty government files. On the other hand, the Data Protection Act was finding its footing as a safeguard of personal data. However, between these two laws lies the delicate balance of our digital era. That is, the right to know versus the right to be protected and the need for sovereignty over information without suffocating freedom of the press.

Data sovereignty sounds straightforward enough. Those who understand it, understand it as the idea that information stored in Botswana should be governed by Botswana laws. However, for journalists, it is a double-edged sword. On one side, it could protect confidential sources from foreign interference and shield citizens from external exploitation. On the other hand, it risks becoming a convenient excuse for secrecy, with authorities waving the flag of sovereignty to deny access to records that are clearly in the public interest.

Editor's Comment
Boko should stop the fighting and start the delivering

With his theme of 'Delivering on Our Promise, One Step at a Time', he sought to project an image of a focused, determined leader building a new ‘Rome’. Sadly, parts of his speech were not about laying bricks, but about settling old scores.It is deeply worrying that a head of government would use such a pivotal national address to launch another bitter broadside against the media and his political detractors. His portrayal of the...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up