Mmegi

Ngakaagae challenges evidence in Phase 2 shootout case

Tsaone Reboeleng
Tsaone Reboeleng

As the trial for the survivor of the 2022 infamous Phase 2 shootout incident got underway, her lawyer has challenged the evidence presented by prosecutors questioning whether indeed the exchange of fire happened.

The trial of Tsaone Rebeloeng, who survived the ‘exchange’ of fire between law enforcement officers and alleged robbers, started on Thursday at the Extension 2 Magistrate Court. First to take the stand was Sergeant Sakaiwa Modire of the Botswana Police Service who told the court that on February 23, 2022, they received a report that Security Systems cash in transit van had been robbed at Bank of Baroda.

He stated that, following on the report, officers then went on a search for alleged cash in transit heist robbers, which led them to a Phase 2 house. Upon arrival at the location, Modire revealed that they were involved in a shootout with the suspects. “As we approached the house in Phase 2, we heard gunshots from inside the house. We leaned against the wall and steadily went inside the house. When we got in, other gunshots were fired from the ceiling,” Modire said, adding his team returned fire to protect themselves from the suspects. “We immediately returned fire and two bodies fell from the ceiling, actually there were three. We went from other rooms asking whoever is in the house to come out but nobody did,” he added. However, Rebeloeng’s attorney Kgosietsile Ngakaagae challenged if there was ever a shootout as the ballistic report does not assist in clearing that. “I have the ballistics of all the firearms that were recovered and the report does not show who these rifles belong to whether BPS, DIS,” Ngakaagae said.

Editor's Comment
Use social media to build, not destro

It is a warning flare to every Motswana who logs onto social media. As a country, we have reached a point where the line between robust debate and outright destruction has become dangerously blurred. At face value, Mabeo’s response, which seeks an apology and threat of a defamation suit, might seem severe to some. But we cannot ignore the context. The comment in question did not offer a policy critique or question a political decision.It...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up