mmegi

The law and justice: Complementary or contradictory?

In Charles Dickens’ fictional masterpiece entitled Oliver Twist, Mr. Bumble, a minor antagonist, uttered a phrase that has since been acclaimed worldwide, “The law is a ass – a idiot.” The setting was a court of law. Mr. Bumble was advised, “The law supposes that your wife acts under your direction.”

Wrought with frustration, he came up with this classic response, perhaps in reference to the unyielding nature of the law. This reminds me of the “Dura lex, sed lex” principle, Latin for “the law is harsh, but it is the law.”

Several decades after the publication of Oliver Twist, a celebrated trailblasing English judge named Lord Denning observed, “The law is an ass.” Is that your view about the law? Especially in cases where you feel it defies logic and runs contrary to the principles of justice? I want to acknowledge the seeming tension between two elements that are crucial in fostering the evolution of jurisprudential refinement, the law and justice. Which one of these is more important, thereby rendering the other subservient?

Editor's Comment
BDF visitation approval a welcome development

BDF camps are military camps, and there is a need for stricter rules and regulations to safeguard their operations as well as ensure the safety of civilians. Of course, military personnel are human, and they have relatives as well as girlfriends and boyfriends, but the fact remains that the BDF is responsible for ensuring national security and stability and, as such, will be one of the first targets in the event of possible attacks. The decision...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up