Mmegi

Mfolo denies interference in Maponda saga

Mix-up: Maponda signed contracts with Matebele and GU. PIC: FILE
Mix-up: Maponda signed contracts with Matebele and GU. PIC: FILE

FRANCISTOWN: The Botswana Football Association CEO, Mfolo Mfolo, has shot down suggestions that he is interfering in the Thabo Maponda transfer dispute.

Mfolo recently wrote a letter to Matebele ordering the club to release Maponda to Gaborone United (GU). The striker signed a contract extension with Matebele FC in February this year, which runs until May 2026. He then signed a pre-contract with GU in May before signing on the dotted lines for three years with the Reds in July. GU gave Maponda a signing-on fee of P50, 000. The player also received a salary from GU and participated in some friendly matches before returning to Matebele, which has sparked a dispute between the two sides. There was an element of disapproval when Mfolo wrote to Matebele.

The sentiment from many stakeholders was that the matter could have been referred to the Players’ Status Committee as per the norm. The BFA has even been accused of siding with GU in the Maponda saga, something which Mfolo has denied. “We are not interfering. Not all issues go through the status committee. We are trying to advise the player administratively and protect his career. He was not honest in his dealings and if the issue was to go to the Players’ Status Committee, he would probably get a ban, which would affect his career,” Mfolo told MmegiSport yesterday. Mfolo also explained why the BFA has instructed Maponda to report to GU within 24 hours from the date of the associations' correspondence to the player to facilitate his registration with the team, despite the fact he signed an extension with Matebele before signing with GU. "According to the rules, the last contract that the player signs is the one that is binding, so the player must go back to GU.

Editor's Comment
Micro-procurement maze demands urgent reform

Whilst celebrating milestones in inclusivity, with notably P5 billion awarded to vulnerable groups, the report sounds a 'siren' on a dangerous and growing trend: the ballooning use of micro-procurement. That this method, designed for small-scale, efficient purchases, now accounts for a staggering 25% (P8 billion) of total procurement value is not a sign of agility, but a 'red flag'. The PPRA’s warning is unequivocal and must be...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up