Whilst it was viewed as a passing phase, it has turned out to be the tip of the iceberg as the BFL has returned to the equally struggling clubs for financial salvation. This week, the BFL announced a decision to deduct 10% of funds from gate takings for each club. The funds will be used for matchday expenses, including paying match officials who have gone for months without remuneration. Some Premiership clubs gross less than P1,000 on a bad match day, and now they will have the added burden of sharing the crumbs with the BFL secretariat. BFL outgoing chief executive officer, Billy Sekgororoane, said all clubs, irrespective of their financial status, are expected to contribute the 10% from their gate takings. "It is binding to all clubs," he said. Further, he said there were no consultations with the clubs as the BFL body was given a mandate to run the league, and decisions are taken in the best interest of the affiliates.
The BFL argues that it had no other option, as a lack of funds would mean halting league action, which resumes this weekend after the festive season and Africa Cup of Nations break. "The board made the decision and informed the clubs of the decision. The board is elected by the clubs to run the league and make decisions on their behalf. The clubs are represented on the board. It was made by the board, which is representative of the clubs," Sekgororoane said. "The clubs have not objected as it is critical for the continuation of the league without interruption," he added. He defended the board's decision and said that if well managed, it could be sustainable. "It is something that will assist with matchday expenses. We are creating a pool of funds; this 10% contribution is going towards a pool; whatever teams put in, that pool will build," he said. Sekgororoane further said the clubs own the league, and where there is a need for cash injection, the teams need to find a way to bridge the gap. "We felt this was a measure that is the least resistant measure, as it depends on gate takings. Teams will still be entitled to their grants; it's a much better way than to reduce the grants."
