This shift has sparked curiosity amongst Batswana, who are eager to see how the new government manages parliamentary debates and national affairs. One of the key issues highlighted during the early days of this Parliament is the apparent need for a constitutional transition clause to ensure smoother handovers between governments. The transition period saw some delays and confusion, underscoring the importance of better preparation for new political parties assuming governance roles.
As the UDC-led government settled into office, challenges in parliamentary operations became evident. Ministers faced difficulties during question-and-answer sessions, with some struggling to respond confidently to inquiries raised by MPs. This has prompted calls for retreats or training sessions to help ministers better understand government operations and enhance their performance in Parliament. Despite these initial hurdles, the ministers' academic qualifications and the experience of some MPs are seen as assets that could help improve governance with time and experience. Members of Parliament with prior parliamentary or civil service experience have shown a quicker grasp of their responsibilities, and those assigned ministries aligned with their qualifications seem better equipped to handle debates and answer questions effectively. An interesting development in the 13th Parliament is the increased use of Setswana in debates. This shift has been well-received by the public, who had long expressed concerns about the dominance of English in parliamentary discussions. The move towards incorporating vernacular debates makes the proceedings more accessible to ordinary citizens, fostering greater engagement and understanding. The opposition Botswana Congress Party (BCP), known for its robust critique of government policies, has maintained its assertiveness in grilling the UDC ministers. This has placed the UDC under pressure, particularly as many of the policies in use are carryovers from the BDP era, which the UDC previously criticised whilst in opposition. The BCP’s familiarity with these policies gives them an advantage in debates, allowing them to hold the new government accountable. Whilst some ministers remain composed under scrutiny, others have shown signs of intimidation.
