Gov’t not complying with 11 court judgments
Tuesday, February 18, 2025 | 610 Views |
Nelson Ramaotwana. PIC: PHATSIMO KAPENG
Answering a question in Parliament recently, he revealed that the reasons for the non-compliance are due to a number of reasons. They vary from unavailability of funds, ambiguity in the court order, death of the employee, or the employer still awaiting verification of employment details from the employee and complexities in computing the judgment debts, especially in cases involving many litigants such as multiple grading and titling cases. The minister, however, said reaching out to the beneficiaries of some of these judgments for discussions has been one of the ways by which government attempts implementation. “The causes of action in these matters range from unfair dismissals, promotion and progression, multiple grading, scarce skills allowance, acting allowance, delinking, breach of employment contract, transfers, subsistence and overtime issues,” he told Parliament.
Ramaotwana was responding to a question from Kanye West legislator Victor Phologolo who had asked, amongst others, the number of judgments that went against those the government had failed to comply with in the past 10 years. “The recent audit carried out by the Attorney General's division dealing with civil cases has revealed that in the last 10 years, there were a total of 212 judgments (68 reported and 144 unreported) relating to labour matters in which the government was a party. “Of the 212 judgments delivered in the last 10 years, 116 (54.7%) were in favour of the government, whilst 96 (45.3%) were against the government,” the minister further disclosed.
It is a warning flare to every Motswana who logs onto social media. As a country, we have reached a point where the line between robust debate and outright destruction has become dangerously blurred. At face value, Mabeo’s response, which seeks an apology and threat of a defamation suit, might seem severe to some. But we cannot ignore the context. The comment in question did not offer a policy critique or question a political decision.It...