the monitor

Masalela's case and questions of selective justice

The recent disqualification of Tshepiso Masalela has ignited debate across the athletics community. What was supposed to be the athlete's finest moment turned into frustration during a 1,500m race in Poland on Sunday.

Masalela was disqualified, for what was termed improper conduct after he raised his hand in a gun-like gesture directed at his nearest opponent. The move to disqualify him raises difficult questions about consistency in officiating. Masalela is one of Botswana’s brightest middle-distance talents known for his competitive grit on the track. Yet in a matter of moments, his performance in Poland was overshadowed by a ruling that many argue could have been handled differently.

Disqualifications in athletics are not uncommon. The rulebook exists to preserve fairness and officials are tasked with making rapid decisions under intense scrutiny. In Masalela’s case, however, critics contend that the punishment appeared severe when compared to similar incidents that have drawn only warnings.

Editor's Comment
FMD management: A ticking time bomb

“The trouble with government regulation of the market is that it prohibits capitalistic acts between consenting adults.”~ Robert NozickWhile government must contain the disease, it must also confront the growing economic hardship caused by its response. For many rural households, cattle remain a source of livelihood and the only means for tending for thousands of families, and for these kind of people the longer the restrictions continue, the...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up