Axed quartet's future rests on Appeals Committee
Friday, July 26, 2024 | 390 Views |
Butale
The BFA will go to the polls to elect a new committee on September 14, but the Elections Committee's vetting process claimed four prominent scalps. Presidential hopefuls, Tariq Babitseng and Masego Ntshingane were axed from the contest although the reasons were not publicly advanced when a list of those who have made the final cut was released last week Friday. Phazha Butale and Carlos Sebina, who eyed the vice president role, also fell short of the requirements, according to the Elections Committee chaired by Moemedi Letina. Submission for interest to contest closed on June 26 but on the following day, the aspiring candidates were reportedly informed that some delegates had nominated more than once, which is against the rules. “They were asked to go back and ask people to nominate once.
They were given up to July 3 to comply. It was a compliance issue,” a source close to the developments said. “Some of the candidates who were vetted out expressed surprise when they saw their names posted on social media before they were officially informed of the process,” the source added. The candidates reportedly felt they should have been informed first as, in the case of vetting, they were supposed to appeal within four days. Unsuccessful candidates received their letters this week Monday and by Wednesday, all four had lodged their appeals. Eyes will now be on advocate Mpho Garebatho who heads the Elections Appeals Committee. Both Babitseng and Ntshingane confirmed they had appealed the decision but could not make any further comments on the matter. However, the source said the letters cited issues of compliance as reasons for the vetting out. “The candidates who were vetted feel the reasons that were advanced have been complied with and therefore expect a reprieve from the Appeals Committee,” the source further added.
More than P8.1 million has already been spent, yet there appears to be no lasting solution in sight. This is not simply a dispute between the DIS and a group of officers. It is a matter of public accountability. Every pula spent by government comes from taxpayers who expect public funds to be used wisely and responsibly, especially during economic hardships faced by many.The officers exercised their constitutional right to seek justice through...