A new chance for Darfur

NEW BRUNSWICK: As the crisis in Sudan's Darfur region worsens and negotiaitions to end it drag on, an international consensus is emerging around a "muscular" policy based on public denunciation, severe economic sanctions, and, increasingly, threats of military force.

But none of these steps, taken alone or together, can bring about the ends that their often well-intentioned advocates seek. On the contrary, they risk reproducing the havoc that such measures have unleashed in Iraq and elsewhere in recent years.

In the United States, cautionary voices have been notably absent even among staunchly liberal newspapers like The New York Times . Foreign policy advisers to the Democratic Party and neo-conservatives alike have called for "action" against Sudan - demands that have been echoed by an international group of intellectuals and celebrities ranging from Umberto Eco, Jrgen Habermas, and Harold Pinter to Bob Geldof, George Clooney, Mia Farrow, Matt Damon, Mick Jagger, and J.K. Rowling.

Editor's Comment
Ruling party should tread carefully on cadre deployment

But on the particularly sensitive question of cadre deployment, the BNF must tread very carefully.The issue deserves robust debate, not ideological enthusiasm. Recent public comments from the BNF leadership are reassuring: the party has said that government positions should be based on merit and competence rather than party membership, and that it does not have a specific cadre-deployment policy.That principle should remain firmly at the centre...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up