Response to MD Lecha
Thursday, May 20, 2010
It should have rather been placed under Opinions, although if I were Editor, I probably would not even have published it!
Their argument is premised on 3 issues: 1) Sidney Pilane's nationality and whether that allows him to hold political office, 2) legality of Pilane as an Advocate and 3) the legitimacy of Pilane's law firm. None of these are of national interest as MD Lecha claims. They are rather petty and not worthy of any serious consideration. I thus write this to challenge MD Lecha to desist from submitting such weak and ill-informed notes in future.
It highlights the need to protect rights such as access to clean water, education, healthcare and freedom of expression.President Duma Boko, rightly honours past interventions from securing a dignified burial for Gaoberekwe Pitseng in the CKGR to promoting linguistic inclusion. Yet, they also expose a critical truth, that a nation cannot sustainably protect its people through ad hoc acts of compassion alone.It is time for both government and the...