Parliamentary Committees: Will they be effective?

No Image

The stand-off between the ruling party and the Opposition in Parliament over Parliamentary committees, including inter-Parliamentary committees, has been somewhat resolved.

The boycott and suspension of participation in committees by the Opposition paid off, especially the non-participation in inter-Parliamentary committees. The ruling party got the message that they don’t have a right to do as they please simply because they are the governing party. 

Opposition Members of Parliament (MPs) had at the beginning of the 11th Parliament boycotted and suspended participation in Parliamentary committees, citing the nomenclature of committees which they contended was skewed in favour of the ruling party. They argued that this would seriously compromise Parliamentary oversight of the executive because, at the time, the governing party chaired all 23 committees except two. It was also well represented in inter-Parliamentary committees and slotted the Opposition in only those which required Opposition representation. The ruling party reasoned that they were the majority party in the House and that representation in committees was proportionate with representation in parliament.

Editor's Comment
Who watches the watchdog?

For a fact, in a democratic society such as Botswana, the media plays a crucial role of being watchdog, holding the powerful to account and exposing all possible wrongdoing for the benefit of the public.There has been a nagging question about who watches the watchdog after all? Perhaps, the investigations into alleged wrongful acts implicating those supposed to be playing the watchdog role will shed more light into what has happened such that the...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up