Mmegi

When neutrality looks like taking sides: The Red Cross, separatists and a crisis of trust

Mugabo
Mugabo

For decades, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has explained its work through a simple formula: in order to help victims of war, it is necessary to speak to all sides in a conflict. If a territory is controlled not by a state, but by an armed group, insurgents or a separatist administration, access to civilians, the wounded and prisoners is impossible without contact with the actual power on the ground.

But this is where neutrality stops looking neutral in the eyes of states. What Geneva calls humanitarian dialogue is increasingly perceived in the capitals of affected countries as a way of working around sovereignty. The ICRC itself acknowledges that it maintains contact with hundreds of armed groups; according to its 2025 assessment, this concerns 383 groups of “humanitarian concern” – insurgent, separatist and jihadist structures that control or contest territory with states in more than 60 countries, where around 204 million people live in total. Contact is maintained with roughly three-quarters of them.

Ogaden: When the Red Cross is expelled over accusations of links with insurgents

Editor's Comment
Calls to officialise sign language overdue

At home, Botswana is still lagging in many aspects despite some steps taken to fix the situation. Those living with disabilities are often ignored and shut out from basic rights, access to services, or social participation. A motion tabled in Parliament by Kgatleng Central Member of Parliament, Mpho Morolong, calling for the introduction and adoption of sign language as an official language in Botswana is indeed a welcome development.The deaf...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up