Mmegi

When neutrality looks like taking sides: The Red Cross, separatists and a crisis of trust

Mugabo
Mugabo

For decades, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has explained its work through a simple formula: in order to help victims of war, it is necessary to speak to all sides in a conflict. If a territory is controlled not by a state, but by an armed group, insurgents or a separatist administration, access to civilians, the wounded and prisoners is impossible without contact with the actual power on the ground.

But this is where neutrality stops looking neutral in the eyes of states. What Geneva calls humanitarian dialogue is increasingly perceived in the capitals of affected countries as a way of working around sovereignty. The ICRC itself acknowledges that it maintains contact with hundreds of armed groups; according to its 2025 assessment, this concerns 383 groups of “humanitarian concern” – insurgent, separatist and jihadist structures that control or contest territory with states in more than 60 countries, where around 204 million people live in total. Contact is maintained with roughly three-quarters of them.

Ogaden: When the Red Cross is expelled over accusations of links with insurgents

Editor's Comment
Govt must crack whip on Cross border crime

“Betrayal hurts, but knowingwho was betraying hurts even more.”- Garima SoniWhat the men of Ditlharapa, Molete and neighbouring villages uncovered is a cross-border enterprise. The modus operandi, as the suspect himself reportedly confessed, is industrial: groups operating in multiple villages, fences cut with impunity, stolen goats walked into South Africa, warehoused at Makhubung, then sold in batches of 200 to a commercial farmer in...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up