Mmegi

In the name of love

Iconic: Auguste Rodin’s sculpture, “The Kiss”
Iconic: Auguste Rodin’s sculpture, “The Kiss”

Is it possible to long for love with every fiber of one’s body? To desire another person with your whole heart and mind? First, both of these expressions are figures of speech, not to be taken literally.

In fact, they are deliberate exaggerations solely intended to give emphasis. Second, although the expressions are now considered clichés because they have long been overused and are everywhere, nonetheless, they still convey a basic truth. This truth is that love is a set of intense emotions, behaviors, and experiences that border on attachment, deep affection, care, commitment, and sacrifice by one for another. Third, because love is an emotion of one person for another, it is necessarily and intrinsically a risk, not a guarantee. No matter what we do to convey it, or how we express it to the one we love, there is absolutely no guarantee that our love for another may foil betrayal, or be reciprocated or permanent.

If the sweet story about the date of February 14 being celebrated as a day of love in honor of Saint Valentine is true, then his assumed death for love was laudatory and worthy of emulation. Similarly, if Geoffrey Chaucer’s writings on romantic love in the 14th century are the reason why we perceive this date as a time for romance, all the more reason we should celebrate the day and its significance as often as we can. In an age when we are likely to wage both peace and war concurrently and sometimes consecutively, if the month of February is recognized globally as a month for love, for the simple reason that where love abounds there can be no war, then, I reckon that, we need more than one February in a year. In fact, if, from time to time, we could pull back the curtain on humanity’s basic instinct for love, we may be able to expose and consequently retain love’s allure, at all times.

Editor's Comment
BPF should get house in order

Speaker of the National Assembly, Dithapelo Keorapetse, has this week rightly washed his hands of the mess, refusing to wade into a party squabble that has no clear leadership and no single version of the truth.When a single party sends six different letters to the Speaker’s office, each claiming to be the authoritative voice, it is not just confusion, but an embarrassment.Keorapetse is correct to insist on institutional boundaries. Parliament...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up