the monitor

'Morupisi's allegations didn't spare President'

Morupisi PIC: PHATSIMO KAPENG
Morupisi PIC: PHATSIMO KAPENG

Justice Mercy Garekwe of the Court of Appeal (CoA) says Carter Morupisi's allegations against judges presiding over his sentencing when sent to jail didn't only sting but also insinuate the President interfered with the judicial process.

Garekwe stated that Morupisi's allegations that the justices presiding over his sentencing "mortgaged their conscience to the Executive" and tried to impress the President, has shredded to pieces and dragged in the mud the integrity of the CoA. In a recent ruling where she declared that the State's appeal against the decision of the High Court to free from jail the former Permanent Secretary to the President (PSP), Garekwe said the allegations made were damning and painted a picture that the President was interfering with the Judiciary.

"The weight of the allegations made against the justices of this court who presided over the sentencing of Morupisi, and premised on a statement that appears in the sentencing judgment, can't be overlooked for they indeed paint a dim, damning, and alarming picture about the integrity of the said justices and, therefore, the CoA in general. It is important that I reproduce some of these allegations and contentions. They also don't spare the President of this Republic, insinuating, as they do, that he is interfering with the judicial arm of government," she said. Morupisi was released from prison on January 3, 2025, after successfully challenging his sentencing from the CoA because Justice Singh Walia's utterance about the President's desire to "see the end of corruption" was unconstitutional and infringed on him as the judge was only trying to impress the President at his expense.

Editor's Comment
Use social media to build, not destro

It is a warning flare to every Motswana who logs onto social media. As a country, we have reached a point where the line between robust debate and outright destruction has become dangerously blurred. At face value, Mabeo’s response, which seeks an apology and threat of a defamation suit, might seem severe to some. But we cannot ignore the context. The comment in question did not offer a policy critique or question a political decision.It...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up