Lawyers advice against Dow�s bill

Chilisa is of the view that the bill is draconian
Chilisa is of the view that the bill is draconian

Two prominent lawyers are of the opinion that the intention of the Botswana Examinations Council Amendment Bill of 2015 was to force the teachers to carry out duties that the court has decreed not to be their own, writes staffer OARABILE MOSIKARE

Last year Botswana Sectors for Educators Trade Union (BOSETU) and Botswana Teachers’ Union (BTU) engaged Sefelani Thapelo and Mboki Chilisa to advise on the draft Botswana Examinations Council Amendment Bill of 2015. The duo advised that the purpose of the amendment is to take away the teachers’ ability to negotiate payment for the invigilation work, and to compel them to do the same without any additional payment.

The invigilation battle has been around for a while. In 2009, a dispute arose concerning whether the invigilation and supervision of external senior secondary school examinations fell within the scope and ambit of a teacher’s duties. The matter went to court, and in the case of BOSETU vs Opelo Makhandlela case number MAHFT-000013-09, Justice Mpaphi Phumaphi found in favour of the union. Thapelo had scored this important victory for BOSETU before Phumaphi.

Editor's Comment
Our food safety matters

We commend the GCC inspectors for their vigilance in uncovering serious hygiene violations at establishments like Pick 'n Pay (South Ring Mall), Bravo Restaurant (Main Mall), Chicken Twist (Bonnington), Spar (Main Mall Bakery and Butchery), Choppies Butchery, Pie Time, and Fours Bakery. Their decisive action which includes temporary closures, confiscation of unsafe food, and laying charges sends a powerful, necessary message: food safety is...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up