Lawyers advice against Dow�s bill

Chilisa is of the view that the bill is draconian
Chilisa is of the view that the bill is draconian

Two prominent lawyers are of the opinion that the intention of the Botswana Examinations Council Amendment Bill of 2015 was to force the teachers to carry out duties that the court has decreed not to be their own, writes staffer OARABILE MOSIKARE

Last year Botswana Sectors for Educators Trade Union (BOSETU) and Botswana Teachers’ Union (BTU) engaged Sefelani Thapelo and Mboki Chilisa to advise on the draft Botswana Examinations Council Amendment Bill of 2015. The duo advised that the purpose of the amendment is to take away the teachers’ ability to negotiate payment for the invigilation work, and to compel them to do the same without any additional payment.

The invigilation battle has been around for a while. In 2009, a dispute arose concerning whether the invigilation and supervision of external senior secondary school examinations fell within the scope and ambit of a teacher’s duties. The matter went to court, and in the case of BOSETU vs Opelo Makhandlela case number MAHFT-000013-09, Justice Mpaphi Phumaphi found in favour of the union. Thapelo had scored this important victory for BOSETU before Phumaphi.

Editor's Comment
Boko should stop the fighting and start the delivering

With his theme of 'Delivering on Our Promise, One Step at a Time', he sought to project an image of a focused, determined leader building a new ‘Rome’. Sadly, parts of his speech were not about laying bricks, but about settling old scores.It is deeply worrying that a head of government would use such a pivotal national address to launch another bitter broadside against the media and his political detractors. His portrayal of the...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up