the monitor

Inside the Lemang Dijo programme

The programme is said to be eligible to a Motswana who is tax-exempt, aged 18 years and above PIC PHATSIMO KAPENG
The programme is said to be eligible to a Motswana who is tax-exempt, aged 18 years and above PIC PHATSIMO KAPENG

The Government of Botswana recently launched the Lemang Dijo Programme, a new agricultural initiative aimed at boosting food security and supporting micro-scale farmers across the country.

This innovative scheme, according to the government, is designed to address the shortcomings of previous subsidy programmes like the Arable Land Development Programme (ALDEP), Integrated Support Programme for Arable Agriculture Development (ISPAAD), and Temo Letlotlo. Whilst outlining the Lemang Dijo Programme, the government states the programme will be implemented through a segmented and tiered approach and that it will ensure assistance is specifically targeted at resource-poor beneficiaries, safeguarding the integrity and intent of the support offered.

"The Lemang Dijo will provide a 100% subsidy for tillage services and pesticides for up to one hectare, delivered via an e-voucher valued at P4,400, which also includes provisions for one beehive," the government says in the programme guidelines. Moreover, the guidelines of the programme state that this one-hectare support model—rooted in technology, integrated crop-bee farming practices, and risk insurance—aligns seamlessly with Botswana’s fiscal realities whilst enhancing household food security. Furthermore, the government says the programme optimises accountability, bolsters the efficiency of extension services and champions environmental sustainability. The government argues that Lemang Dijo, by limiting the subsidised area to one hectare, the programme seeks to amplify productivity whilst facilitating manageable production levels.

Editor's Comment
Use social media to build, not destro

It is a warning flare to every Motswana who logs onto social media. As a country, we have reached a point where the line between robust debate and outright destruction has become dangerously blurred. At face value, Mabeo’s response, which seeks an apology and threat of a defamation suit, might seem severe to some. But we cannot ignore the context. The comment in question did not offer a policy critique or question a political decision.It...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up