Mmegi

Close leaks before hiking tax- Unions tell gov’t

Rari PIC: KENNEDY RAMOKONE
Rari PIC: KENNEDY RAMOKONE

Trade unions say they are troubled by government’s decision to increase tax for high income earners, which they say will burden the already financially-struggling working class.

Finance minister, Nadaba Gaolathe, announced a hike to the corporate income tax rate, and to the top personal income tax rate, in his 2025 Budget Speech in February. Gaolathe proposed to raise the corporate tax rate and the top personal tax rate by 1.5%, meaning that the new corporate income tax rate would be 23.5%, and the top personal income tax rate would be 26.5%. However, the Six (6+1) Cooperating Trade Unions say the decision will have an impact on the already constricted buying power of the workers. Speaking during the Six (6+1) Cooperating Trade Unions’ press conference on Wednesday, Botswana Public Employees Union (BOPEU) deputy secretary-general, Ketlhapeng Karab,o said while they agree in principle with government on the need to create a ‘cake’ for the country, they believe that increasing tax at this moment is not a way to go about it. He argued that instead of burdening taxpayers, the government must urgently address the financial leakages draining billions from State coffers. Karabo said what government needs to do first is to plug the leaks in the budget, which have rendered government revenue collection vulnerable. He said what government is trying to achieve is akin to filling up a leaking bucket.

For example, he said there are leaks in government tenders, which has cost the State millions of pula. “People think we don’t want the government to create a cake. But trade unions as partners, agree with government on the creation of wealth for government, which we should share, but it shouldn’t affect the buying power of workers, which is already overburdened. We call on government to stop implementing the proposed 1.5% tax increase but rather call a tripartite to engage first on this matter to show them where the money is where to plug the leaks. Instead of refurnishing a house at a cost of P700 000, check if you can’t do it at P300 000,” he said. He said trade unions have the solutions to these issues and are eager to help government find revenue collection solutions, which would not affect the workers. “We met with the minister twice, the last being on April 1. He promised that he will take the proposal and engage further on it. He agrees with us on the issue of dysfunctional systems and wastage in government. For example, BURS has in the past made profit without even reaching its collection target. This shows that there are a lot of revenue streams that can be targeted before the implementation of the 1.5% increase. The other issue is that he agrees that he has not done consultation with the social partners. We are not saying we don’t totally agree with the model but we believe it can be modified to ensure that it doesn’t involve the workers,” he added.

Meanwhile, the Botswana Sectors of Educators Trade Union (BOSETU) secretary-general, Tobokani Rari, clarified the issue that the unions are the ones to blame for the delay in the resuscitation of the Public Service Bargaining Council (PSBC). He explained that there was a difference in principle between unions. “Some unions believed that once you are a recognised trade union, you should automatically get into the Bargaining Council without the requirement of meeting any set threshold. We argued that this will open for the proliferation of trade unions in the country, which will weaken the voice of workers,” he said. However, he said there is progress on the issue with the parties now looking at the constitution with a view to amending some clauses that are problematic. Furthermore, Rari said there is light in sight on the issue of the funding of the PSBC. Trade unions are of the view that the council should be funded by government as an institution that facilitates the tenets of democracy.

Editor's Comment
Diamond deal demands transparency

Instead, it has sparked a storm of accusations, denials, and unresolved questions about the influence of De Beers on the nation’s politics. Former president Mokgweetsi Masisi’s claims that the diamond giants bankrolled his removal to dodge taxes – and that the new Umbrella for Democratic Change (UDC) government watered down a favourable diamond deal – are explosive matters. But without evidence, they risk becoming a toxic distraction from...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up