Trump and the controversy of Jerusalem

When considering United States President Donald Trump’s decision to officially recognise Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, we learn many things about him:

He is desperate to hold onto his base, which includes so-called Christian fundamentalists, who unquestioningly support Israel, his interest in ‘the ultimate deal’ between Palestine and Israel is non-existent, he has no regard for the opinions of the US’ closest allies, his knowledge of international law is limited, at best, he holds the safety of US personnel abroad in disdain, his understanding of the complexities of the Middle East are far beyond his interest or ability to comprehend, and his belief in human rights is selective.

The list of nations whose leaders expressed their extreme displeasure prior to Trump’s announcement includes both important allies, and countries the US considers ‘enemies’. Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Syria, Russia, the Vatican, Turkey, Germany, France and the European Union all have condemned the move. Even US government experts have cautioned of the potential of increased violence around the world, especially in the Middle East, as a result. What, one might ask, is the advantage to anyone other than Israel of making this change? Without exception,  political experts say this decision will only exasperate current tensions, increase the risk of violence, make the goal of a two-state solution even more difficult, recruit anti-US terrorists, alienate allies and reduce the US’ already tattered reputation on the world stage. Only in Israel is this seen as good news.

Editor's Comment
Micro-procurement maze demands urgent reform

Whilst celebrating milestones in inclusivity, with notably P5 billion awarded to vulnerable groups, the report sounds a 'siren' on a dangerous and growing trend: the ballooning use of micro-procurement. That this method, designed for small-scale, efficient purchases, now accounts for a staggering 25% (P8 billion) of total procurement value is not a sign of agility, but a 'red flag'. The PPRA’s warning is unequivocal and must be...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up