An election is held in a member state, international observers raise concerns, but the Southern African Development Community (SADC) often remains silent or offers only gentle, diplomatic praise. This has led to a widespread belief that the regional body prioritises solidarity amongst governments over the democratic rights of ordinary citizens. This is why the preliminary statement from the SADC Electoral Observation Mission (SEOM) on Tanzania’s 2025 General Election is so significant. It marks a brave and necessary break from the past. For the first time in recent memory, SADC has looked one of its own in the eye and delivered a verdict that is honest, critical and rooted in its own principles. This deserves full and unequivocal commendation. Led by the Right Honourable Richard Msowoya, the mission did not shy away from the uncomfortable truth. Its report details a deeply flawed process. It highlights how opposition leaders were arrested and candidates disqualified, creating an “uneven political playing field”. It notes the “covert acts of general intimidation” and a “tense and intimidating political atmosphere”.
Most damningly, it points to an internet shutdown on election day that prevented proper observation and incidents of violence that stopped its teams from witnessing the vote count. The conclusion is stark and unambiguous: the election “fell short of the requirements of the SADC Principles and Guidelines” and, in most areas, “voters could not express their democratic will”. This is the plain-speaking that citizens across the region have been desperate to hear. It is a vital step in restoring SADC’s credibility as a guardian of democracy, not just a club for leaders. However, a statement, no matter how courageous, is only the first step. The real test lies ahead. SADC must now ensure that its powerful words are turned into meaningful action. The mission’s recommendations are clear: Tanzania must review its Constitution to allow for independent candidates and election petitions, and create an environment where observers and opposition parties can operate without fear or obstruction.
