This time last year I wrote: Why the English Premiership is not the best in the world and I got varied responses from observers. One enraged reader took it more personally and dispatched his condemnation of my analysis; portrayed me as totally 'foolish'. He went all out in loathing my judgement and articulated with a 'phew' in what I really considered disused, really. I dare say that last season English teams did not finish as strongly as anticipated. In last season's Champions League competition, three English teams reached the semi-finals, but the Italian side, AC Milan, took the crown, thus spoiling what appeared to be an English festival. I was somehow reassured that my 'rantings' presented a different judgement to the neutrals on this matter. Not that I was actually banking on the Premiership to fail - why would I do that any way? I was simply tabulating my objectives in this argument. At the closing stages of last season's schedule, I believe I moderately influenced many into understanding that the English Premiership was not as good as it was generally put on paper (off the playground). I would like to make it known that (Part I) still remains a 'stunning' success (to my portfolio) and it got me an award in my usually unoccupied cabinet. So why will I not make a follow-up on this worth-talk-about subject? Even though many feel that the probabilities are not so much in preference to my course this time around, I wish to authenticate my opinion. In this argument, I think that at least somebody has to differ with the swayed judgement. If not, what will be the point to start an argument when your vision is entirely similar?
Therefore, I lay out new shortcomings about the English League and conceivably will open another 'can' of words.
