Some of us have been following his articles in diffremt newspapers, all appearing under the name of Arafat Khan. But Arafat Khan is just a discredited Form Two dropout who cannot construct a readable paragraph in English, let alone write a whole article in a newspaper. I know the article was written by Moupo himself because, among others, at all the events referred to in the article, such as meetings that lasted for 90 minutes, Arafat Khan could not have been there. Khan would probably have been struggling with his Form Two supplementary examinations, which we are told he has failed dismally, hence now renting out his name to Muopo. Prior to the Molelpolole congress, most central committee meetings were chaired by Dr Kathleen Letshabo, because most of the time you were hiding from your creditors. You are also notorious for missing important parliamentary debates, including President Mogae's State of the nation address, because you were busy soliciting for money from unsuspecting party faithful to replenish your looted trust account. You cannot therefore competently comment on my contributions as Secretary for International Affairs. You were simply not there. My contributions as an intellectual of the left are available to all and sundry to access, and I will not try to blow my trumpet. Suffice it to say there is no correlation between wearing party colours and my credentials as a socialist. And for your information, being a head of an academic department is not a promotion or rank, but a mere administrative responsibility.. So Mr Moupo (Comrade has lost any meaning with relation to you) come out of the closet, be man enough and stop hiding behind the name Arafat Khan. But I guess you are just being yourself, always bogus, dishonest and fake, even in his diatribe. Come on man, stand up and explain your treacherous role in the near demise of BNF.
Whilst readers would have expected you to refute the very pertinent points raised in my letter, you brush them aside, like the discredited lawyer that you are, in order to divert the attention of the jury (the reading public and the BNF general membership) by raising superfluous issues. For example, you raise the issue of why you have not been charged and prosecuted with looting your clients' trust account. I guess that is for the Law Society to answer.
