Love thy neighbour, love thy dog

The allegation of being "un-African" continues to be used in multiple ways by political leaders to delimit African identities under the guise of decolonisation.

In news reports on President Zuma's latest allegation against dog ownership and their treatment by black people, are a number of bizarre, and relatively normative, ideas of humans and other animals, and their relationship to each other in the new South Africa; a space that is in need of decolonisation.

The discourse that loving and taking care of other animals is "un-African", a white phenomenon that black people are trying to emulate, has a long history in South Africa. While much of this history has legitimacy (white South Africans who treat/ed their black domestic help as lesser subjects than their companion animals), this discourse has unfortunately, much to the detriment of the decolonising project, not really moved beyond Zuma's latest remarks. What does it mean to be treated "better than" or "less than"? And who gets to decide the marker from which "better" and "less" are decided?

Editor's Comment
Dear gov't, doctors: Ntwakgolo ke ya molomo

With both sides entrenched in legal battles and public spats, the risk to public health, trust in institutions, and the welfare of doctors grows by the day. It's time for cooler heads to prevail. The government and BDU must return to the negotiating table, not with threats, but with a shared commitment to resolve this crisis fairly and urgently.At the heart of this dispute lies a simple truth: doctors aren't just employees but guardians...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up