In honest and unbiased research, one’s sampling range is a crucial aspect of proper (“scientific”) investigation. Otherwise, narrower, not-too-informed, a priori assumptions will abound that seriously affect the integrity of one’s conclusions. As such, although Dr Maganu rightly opines that the content of my column is “unconventional” (Weekend Post, 18/07/2015), unconventional conclusions, he should have been clear, do not necessarily mean wrong methods of evidence gathering, or even self-misdirection. It might simply mean, as it does, that the scope of my evidence-gathering reaches far beyond his.
I will give a concrete example. We all somewhat naively trust that “mainstream” science is always bona-fide, always considers everything before carefully tendering an opinion; that they have no agenda other than unadulterated truth. But just as he quotes John Dominic Crossan that “there are always alternative perspectives, even if we do not hear them”, a genre called “Non-fiction Alternative History” was born out of what many detected as a sinister, well-orchestrated plot to subvert certain empirical and indisputable findings. Indeed, why does their “mainstream” studiously ignore, and leave it to “others” to resolve the mystery of why very sophisticated objects such as iron gear-wheels and aluminium gear-rails are periodically found fossilised in coal and volcanic ash 300 million years and more? Are they afraid of what these finds imply? Or is it simply so that people like Dr Maganu are kept confined to a narrow base of evidence-gathering that is carefully predisposed towards not troubling the status quo at all – whereas the unadulterated truth, quite evidently, lies well beyond the set boundaries of conventional thought?
Actually, Maganu’s deficiency, his a priori assumption delivered as innuendo, is to subtly opine that a Motswana cannot shine light into unchartered waters and actually change paradigms; not when all these great Western minds have run their course. And in a 1000-word serialised column such as this, meant for general public consumption, I cannot present copious examples and rationalisations in each article otherwise one topic would drag on for too long and people might lose thread. But it is all there in my books (has he read them before opining in public?). In any case I always supply my email, below, to encourage truth-seekers to engage me directly on anything they wish to refute or know more about. Honest ones do and I always answer them satisfactorily. I also do not wish to be always lumped with Benson Saili because certain of our differences are very deep, even fundamental, yet he (Benson) thinks it is “better” that we do not debate them privately or publicly.
Now, turning back to our story, we saw examples showing that all the ancient terms for “giant”, including the Setswana term “dimo” contain reference to the skies/heavens. This is extremely significant. Indeed, the little-known reason for the abnormal height of these Igigi (giants), I divulged, was due to protracted periods in the weightlessness of space – a condition still afflicting astronauts today – and every indication is that the Igigi (giants) were astronauts; that it was not a genetic thing at all.
This week, we see if Igigi (giants) truly existed and, if so, why they were reputed to be “man-eating”. Indeed, why would they be called “heroes” in biblical translations? This emanates from he-ru, “the Red One”. In fact “red” is actually ru-ed and ru is the source of rustic, ruddy, etc. – all meaning “red”, hence Russia, Amarru, etc. all point to White people, whose pale skin turned red in the sun. Later translations say “mighty ones” (tii-ta-an: Titans) instead of “hero”, but this does not change much. Indeed, red is the predominant hair colour of hundreds of ancient, mummified, Caucasian giants found in many sites around the world: Lovelock (Nevada), USA; Bathurst (NSW), Australia, and Tarim Basin (Xinjiang), China (areas traditionally of non-White people). Spin doctors, embarrassed by the sudden demotion of their beloved Columbus as the first White person to reach “New World” areas, say that the red hair is derived from specific soil minerals, but genetic tests in any case confirm that they are Caucasian.
What about their reputation for being “man-eating”? “From the 104th Shar (i.e. circa 50 000 BC), Igigi deserters settled on Earth in large numbers”, Sumerians say: a time anthropologists say “White man appears in Europe with new tools and knowledge”. Disapproved of, and basically left to fend for themselves, their precious kgetsi ya ga dimo (sack of [technological] treasures) was a lucrative target for others, helping to create enmity between man and giant. Eventually, the Ice-Age began to kick in as the Earth’s obliquity (rhythmic tilting) crept to its most extreme angle. Food became scarce and as the Book of Enoch explains, the giants, like locusts (tsie), sought harvests from people by force (“tithes” in Sotho are still called lopo-tsie: literally – “as requested by the locusts”) – demands that people obeyed (tsaa-tsie). Even today, Matsieng (“place of the locusts”) equates to “primordial place”. Unfortunately, as conditions worsened and harvests became not enough, the giants began to “sin against the earth” and eat mankind himself.
In post-Flood times, the story of giants was eventually dismissed as “talking tsie-badimo (locust-gods)” – a clear sign that people later began to doubt that they ever existed. But as we saw last week, not only did the Israelites see them in Canaan, but they are still in space just as Cark McClelland witnessed; still Watchers for Near-Earth Objects and ready to evacuate our elite in times of impending doom. McClelland, a space-missions veteran, was nevertheless lucky to glimpse one of these secret Watchers – an “alien” nine-foot tall astronaut – in deep conversation with a NASA astronaut out in space…and actually helping him out with his mission!
Comments to [email protected]