There is a little matter of blatant opportunism by those who have called press conferences over this: one of their main arguments has been that it shows indecision on the part of the Presidency- that the President does not know what he wants. I find this illogical: the man has made a decision to have people act and have another be assigned to something else. Is that not a decision? How is that proof of being indecisive?
Maybe they disagree with his decision but then I would ask them if they know all that led to him making that decision? They should rather be questioning the modality of this redeployment, not the act of a cabinet reshuffle itself, unless this now means the inconvenience of them having to do a reshuffle of their own?