the monitor

Some of the doping rules are just insane

Local athletes are failing the anti-doping test in frustrating numbers. Recently, a footballer and a motorsport rider were found on the wrong side of the law to add to a growing list.

While the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) has a duty to keep the sport clean, there is need to re-visit some of the rules around doping. There should be minimal, borderline cases which deserve a warning rather than lengthy suspensions of between two to four years.

The severity of the case must determine the length of the suspension. Chiefly, there should be obvious benefit to the athlete for the use of the banned substance. How does doping help a rider that much? The gains are minimal or next to non-existent.

Editor's Comment
Child protection needs more than prevailing laws

The rise in defilement and missing persons cases, particularly over the recent festive period, points not merely to a failure of policing, but to a profound and widespread societal crisis. Whilst the Police chief’s plea is rightly directed at parents, the root of this emergency runs deeper, demanding a collective response from every corner of our community. Marathe’s observations paint a picture of neglect with children left alone for...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up