Have patronage and paternalism been shaken in the BDP?

In this piece we assess the likely impact on the Botswana Democratic Party of Daniel Kwelagobe's rejection of a cabinet position (which most politicians would die for) in favour of a party position which in theory brings no monetary reward to the holder.

We posit that if his approach is widely adopted by members of his faction (Barata-Phathi) and crystalises into an ethic it could have serious consequences for the party. The move could spell doom to the patronage and paternalism that has for so long held the party together and ensured its continued stay in power. 

The strength of Kwelagobe's campaign seems to have been his unflinching argument that he was contesting for the party chairmanship in accordance with the constitution of the BDP against the advice of the party president, Ian Khama. Kwelagobe's determined stance and 'defiance' of Khama was hailed by the Barata-Phathi and the private media as highly principled and constitutional. However, when examined in the light of history of factionalism in the BDP Kwelagobe's much hyped position is rather a dubious honour. For instance, in 1997 the then President Ketumile Masire prevented Central Committee elections by nominating members from each faction of the party. The Barata-Phati (then known as Kwelagobe-Kedikilwe faction) did not protest Masire's move as unconstitutional.

Editor's Comment
Women unite for progress

It underscores the indispensable role women play in our society, particularly in building strong households and nurturing families. The recognition of women as the bedrock of our communities is not just a sentiment; it's a call to action for all women to stand together and support each other in their endeavours.The society's aim to instil essential principles and knowledge for national development is crucial. By providing a platform for...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up