Mmegi Blogs :: The judiciary after the storm
Banners
Banners
Banners
Banners
Last Updated
Friday 21 September 2018, 15:09 pm.
Banners
The judiciary after the storm

The period between 2008 and 2018 is most notable for political and judicial controversy. It was in the same period that the subject of judicial appointments took centre stage in national discourse and became a hotly contested issue between the government, political parties, labour movements, the Fourth Estate and the Law Society.
By Kgosietsile Ngakaagae Fri 17 Aug 2018, 12:42 pm (GMT +2)
Mmegi Blogs :: The judiciary after the storm








The same period was marred by mutiny in judicial ranks. Judges revolted against the supposed authority of the Chief Justice. The result was a lengthy standoff as ugly as the spectacle itself. When the former President left office, the acrimony appeared to have in part, subsided.

The mutinous judges had been beaten into line and lay prostate at the feet of a triumphant Chief Justice in terminal days of his judicial career. Conversely, the departing President left with a bloody nose, having suffered defeat at the hands of a territorial Law Society jealous of judicial independence.

Having lost the bid for Lordship over the Judicial Service Commission, the all important constitutional entity was immediately match-fixed. It was embellished with a further deployee drawn directly from the corridors of executive power. These occurrences confirmed one thing with absolute certainty; the nation was going through a war for the heart and soul of the judiciary. A war which to some lawyers, had long been won by the executive and which to others, was still raging without end. Gagged by customs, ethics and self-imposed limitations, some members of the judiciary did put up a fight for its independence.

On few occasions, they gave judgements that were by all accounts mutinous.The executive lost the Motumise case, an emphatic reminder that the idea of an absolute or semi-monarchy was anathema to a constitutional state. The judgement conveyed hope that a supposedly comatose judiciary, powerless against power, still reserved a dying kick.

The period 2008 to 2018 could well be called “The Dark Age” of Botswana’s justice system. Never in our nation’s history had the judiciary been so besieged by political influence and executive expectations.

Never had it suffered so much political violence and open internal strife. And never had it appeared so vulnerable. I graduated from law school at the very beginning of the new millennium. The bench was respectable. Sadly, it was staffed mostly by men who did not carry the same passport as I did.

Their reputations were solid and were respected widely by the bar. It was great to practice law then. It was not all about earning a living. As a lawyer, you did not have to worry about anything other than the law and the facts. You never envisaged that during the discharge of your professional labours, some executive considerations could creep in unnoticed and affect the trajectory of your client’s fortunes. Lawyers thrive in such an environment. Jurisprudence thrives in such an

Banners

environment. Democracy thrives in such an environment where the courts are the guarantors of justice and, “the great levellers of all human equality”.

Yet, we saw the temple of justice crumble one pillar at a time under the weight of executive power. Whilst it is correct to say that efforts of some gallant sections of the citizenry slowed down the temple’s absolute demise, it must be said that it was virtually saved by the clock. When the clock ticked, Thor’s hammer was still at work upon the pillars.

There was an air of resignation in some sections of the legal fraternity. I was one of them.  There was a pervasive feeling that the executive held a controlling stake in the judicial enterprise. Many lawyers filed their cases in Francistown running away from the supposed corruption of the Gaborone and Lobatse benches, where a good number of lawyers spoke of a match-fixed bench and a totally mortgaged Court of Appeal.

True, these were perceptions, but such were not altogether unfounded. A predatory executive was at work. Even then, the judiciary has the reputational fragility of a church. Judges too. Perceptions are anything and everything. A corrupt lawyer may be rehabilitated and admitted to the bar. A corrupt judge must go away forever.

So much has been happening since April 1, 2018. Not much on the judicial front, though. The Khama edifice still stands. The Judicial Service Commission has not been reformed. The Court of Appeal, whose reputation has drastically dwindled, needs a makeover here and there.

Two regimes died at nearly the same time; The Dibotelo and Khama regimes. Both were notable, not for any growth in jurisprudence, but for fast-paced drama where the power of the law collided with powerful African reptilian and meteorological sciences an eroded public confidence in the judiciary.

The controversial legacy of the Khama years remains. The monuments stand tall and the current President still functions with what is relatively a Khama government. 

But it is not of the government in general that I speak. The judiciary is capable of self-correction and shedding the image, warranted or unwarranted, of being Khama stooges. In this question, I include very pointedly the Industrial Court, perceptibly, the most compromised and mortgaged of all outfits ever cloaked with judicial pretence.

Do their worships and lordships feel the breeze. It is time for the judiciary to rebuild its battered image and to regain public confidence. The storm is over. At least, we think so.

Subscribe to our Newsletter
Banners
Banners
Banners


Chief On Friday
Fri 17 Aug 2018, 12:42 pm
Fri 10 Aug 2018, 12:43 pm
Fri 03 Aug 2018, 13:19 pm
Fri 27 Jul 2018, 13:48 pm
Fri 20 Jul 2018, 15:59 pm
Fri 13 Jul 2018, 15:17 pm
Fri 06 Jul 2018, 14:07 pm
Fri 29 Jun 2018, 15:43 pm
Fri 22 Jun 2018, 13:55 pm
Fri 15 Jun 2018, 12:36 pm
Fri 01 Jun 2018, 13:29 pm
Fri 25 May 2018, 14:11 pm
Fri 18 May 2018, 15:33 pm
Fri 11 May 2018, 15:00 pm
Fri 04 May 2018, 13:42 pm
Fri 27 Apr 2018, 13:40 pm
Fri 20 Apr 2018, 13:36 pm
Fri 13 Apr 2018, 13:20 pm
Fri 06 Apr 2018, 12:28 pm
Thu 29 Mar 2018, 15:15 pm
Fri 23 Mar 2018, 22:49 pm
Fri 16 Mar 2018, 12:38 pm
Fri 09 Mar 2018, 23:22 pm
Fri 02 Mar 2018, 16:23 pm
Fri 23 Feb 2018, 18:34 pm
Banners
Banners
Exchange Rates
FOREIGN EXCHANGE: Wednesday, 17 Jan 2018
FOREIGN / PULA
PULA / FOREIGN
1 USD = Pula   9.7656
1 GBP = Pula   13.4590
1 EUR = Pula   11.9617
1 YEN = Pula   0.0882
1 ZAR = Pula   0.7938
1 Pula = USD   0.1024
1 Pula = GBP   0.0743
1 Pula = EUR   0.0836
1 Pula = YEN   11.34
1 Pula = ZAR   1.2597
Subscribe to our Newsletter
have a story? Send us a Tip
Banners
  • Previous
    Next
    Masa Centre
    ::: Sunday 23 Sep - Sunday 23 Sep :::
  • Previous
    Next
    Riverwalk
    ::: Sunday 23 Sep - Sunday 23 Sep :::
  • Previous
    The Meg
    Next
    Gamecity
    ::: Friday 10 Aug - Sunday 07 Aug :::
    The Meg
Selefu
Maruping go a boelwa.
Banners
Banners
istanbul escort