Surrogacy case opens can of worms

Gofhamodimo Sithole and Lekoko Baatweng with their lawyers at Court of Appeal.PIC: KAGISO ONKATSWITSE
Gofhamodimo Sithole and Lekoko Baatweng with their lawyers at Court of Appeal.PIC: KAGISO ONKATSWITSE

Divorced Batswana couple in a court battle over a frozen embryo may find themselves dealing with more than they bargained for if the matter reaches the South African courts.

According to the court papers, one complexity is that the divorced couple, Gofamodimo Sithole and Lekoko Baatweng may have infringed on South African laws when they agreed to surrogacy and its unfinished process.

This is because the Court of Appeal yesterday said they did not have any jurisdiction over the frozen embryo and any other agreements that had been made and suggesting that maybe the matter was better placed in South Africa.

Editor's Comment
Inspect the voters' roll!

The recent disclosure by the IEC that 2,513 registrations have been turned down due to various irregularities should prompt all Batswana to meticulously review the voters' rolls and address concerns about rejected registrations.The disparities flagged by the IEC are troubling and emphasise the significance of rigorous voter registration processes.Out of the rejected registrations, 29 individuals were disqualified due to non-existent Omang...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up