To whom does Israel really belong? Part 3

In this third instalment of my miniseries, we continue to see the important role Egypt played in lives of the Biblical Patriarchs from Abraham to the time of David.

We produced compelling evidence (mainly the uncanny similarity in names and sequence with the Egyptian Kings List) that confirmed that they were actually well-known pharaohs of Egypt, which is why archaeologists were unable to find any trace of them in present-day Israel. For those who are unaware, the situation got so bad that historians were (and perhaps still are) on the verge of expunging this entire history from formal history. They need not, as we have seen.

The whole exercise of collating the names of Hebrew Patriarchs with those of Egyptian pharaohs is a whole lot simpler when a Setswana perspective is applied. How can this be? Those who follow this column will know that I have provided overwhelming evidence that it is because the Sotho-Tswana group can be shown to have been forcibly ejected from Egypt as many African legends confirm – even the now-ill-understood phrase go lelela khama le Mogogoro (literally: to cry over Khmer and Mu-Roggo, which names we conclusively related to Egypt). Let us now duly apply Botswana’s powerful lingua franca.

Editor's Comment
Inspect the voters' roll!

The recent disclosure by the IEC that 2,513 registrations have been turned down due to various irregularities should prompt all Batswana to meticulously review the voters' rolls and address concerns about rejected registrations.The disparities flagged by the IEC are troubling and emphasise the significance of rigorous voter registration processes.Out of the rejected registrations, 29 individuals were disqualified due to non-existent Omang...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up