Gaetsaloe vs Debswana: a test of the integrity of Botswana's judicial process

The integrity of the judicial process in Botswana comes under scrutiny at the Court of Appeal on July 26, 2010 when the full bench of the court is expected to hear an application for the recusal of four of its members from hearing an appeal in the matter between Donald Gaetsaloe and Debswana Diamond Company.

Gaetsaloe is represented by Attorney Itumeleng Segopolo of Segopolo & Company, while Debswana is represented by Advocate Stephen Vivian and Dineo Makati-Mpho of Collins Newman & Company
Gaetsaloe, a former employee of Debswana who resigned (and not fired as it has consistently been reported) from the mining giant in December 2004 dissatisfied with standards of governance, launched an action in the High Court in September 2005 claiming unpaid bonuses and other remuneration earned in the course of covering positions additional to his designated post. His action in the High Court is still to go to trial.

The appeal arises out of a ruling by the High Court in June 2008 holding that a substantial portion of his claim had prescribed in terms of the Prescription Act. Gaetsaloe disagrees with the High Court's interpretation of the relevant section of the Act.

Editor's Comment
Inspect the voters' roll!

The recent disclosure by the IEC that 2,513 registrations have been turned down due to various irregularities should prompt all Batswana to meticulously review the voters' rolls and address concerns about rejected registrations.The disparities flagged by the IEC are troubling and emphasise the significance of rigorous voter registration processes.Out of the rejected registrations, 29 individuals were disqualified due to non-existent Omang...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up