Days of Basarwa in CKGR numbered
Friday, April 29, 2022 | 2170 Views |
Home: Metsiamaong in the CKGR PIC: THALEFANG CHARLES
In 2006 the High Court ordered that the refusal by government to allow Basarwa to enter the Central Kalahari Game Reserve (CKGR) unless they are issued with a permit was both unlawful and unconstitutional. This was a majority judgment in the Roy Sesana and Others versus the Attorney General case before then Chief Justice Maruping Dibotelo, Justice Unity Dow and Justice Mpaphi Phumaphi.
It was a landmark ruling that was celebrated by Basarwa as a great victory in their struggle for freedom of movement at their birthplaces inside the CKGR. But in the ruling, the judges were not aware that hardly a week before they delivered their judgement, the Constitution was conveniently amended to repeal a key clause that supported the primary argument in the case. In the amendment, Parliament scrapped off Section 14.3.C that was used to protect Basarwa’s freedom in the CKGR. The reason for amendment was said to make the clause ‘tribally neutral’.
More than P8.1 million has already been spent, yet there appears to be no lasting solution in sight. This is not simply a dispute between the DIS and a group of officers. It is a matter of public accountability. Every pula spent by government comes from taxpayers who expect public funds to be used wisely and responsibly, especially during economic hardships faced by many.The officers exercised their constitutional right to seek justice through...