Mmegi Blogs :: Holy war against Islam
Banners
Banners
Banners
Banners
Banners
Last Updated
Friday 16 August 2019, 15:05 pm.
Banners
Holy war against Islam

Last Friday I was one of the millions of curious spectators who watched Donald Trumpís inaugural address. Interestingly in that inaugural address, President Trump like his predecessor, Barak Obama singled out radical Islamic terrorism as one major enemy that threatened the national security of the United States. Surprisingly he did not even mention Russia or China as threats to the security or prosperity of the United States.
By Solly Rakgomo Fri 27 Jan 2017, 15:57 pm (GMT +2)
Mmegi Blogs :: Holy war against Islam








In terse and clear words, Trump said: “We will reinforce old alliances and form new ones and unite the civilised world against radical Islamic terrorism, which we will eradicate from the face of the Earth.” In fighting against radical Islamic terrorism, Trump asserted that “We will be protected by the great men and women of our military and law enforcement. And most importantly, we will be protected by God.”

 In order to digest his sentiments just take three points worth of consideration to understand Trump’s speech on radical Islamic terrorism. Each point is rooted in history and academic literature, and each point carries serious implications for the peace and security of the United States and the world. First, radical Islamic terrorism is presented as a threat to the so called “civilised world.”

Historically, the phrase 'civilised world' was coined in the era of colonialism to refer primarily to the European nations and by implication to the “uncivilised world” referred to Native Americans in Americas, slaves from Africa, the colonised populations in Asia and the Middle East.  Ali Khan has observed  that under contemporary standards of global discourse, the phrase 'civilised world' is rarely used by diplomats, heads of states, or academic scholars as there is a new understanding that the world is blessed with numerous diverse civilisations, including the Islamic civilisation that spans over centuries in all continents of the world.  From this I still find it unclear and of course I doubt whether President Trump includes all fifty-six Muslim countries as part of the civilised world.

Second, the phrase “radical Islamic terrorism” was invented to argue that Islamic violence emanates from the religion itself and not from any concrete geopolitical grievances for which Muslim militants are fighting in various parts of the world. The phrase “radical Islamic terrorism “became popular with Western neoconservatives who wanted to shift the focus from grievances to Islamic psychology.

For example, Khan rightly reasons that the phrase implies that the Palestinians as Muslims are addicted to violence that has nothing to do with occupation or misery they face as a people. Likewise, the phrase would suggest that the Taliban as Muslims are hooked to religiously-inspired warfare and their violence has little to do with the invasion of Afghanistan.  By adopting the phrase during his campaign and mentioning it in his inaugural speech, President Trump has bought into the idea that a radical version of Islam is inherently brutal and will find excuses to perpetrate violence throughout the world even after all the problems have been solved.

Third, Trump has added a

Banners

holy war component to the eradication of radical Islamic terrorism from the face of the Earth.  In addition to seeking protection from “the great men and women of our military,” Trump claims that “America will be protected by God.”  This simply means that God is on the side of the United States in its wars against various nations and populations, particularly radical Islamic terrorism. This understanding of God’s partisanship in human wars is the cardinal principle of the holy war whether the concept is invoked by Catholics, Protestants, Shias, Sunnis, etc.

My own study of Islamic terrorism suggests that Muslim militancy originates in concrete geopolitical causes, including occupations and invasions. Muslim militants desert their families and children, forfeit their lives, and invite the wrath of mighty states because they are fighting occupation of their lands, exploitation and plundering of their resources ( especially oil and gas), or way of life.

Unless the grievances factor is honestly included in the counter-terrorism equation, my view is that radical Islamic terrorism will not abate. The phrase radical Islamic terrorism is overly provocative. It is a bad piece of rhetoric that does more harm than good. It implicates the religion of Islam, spawning hatred against ordinary Muslim families living in Western countries. The phrase also discourages peace-loving Muslims all over the world to join the fight against terrorism as they feel their religion is being maligned. As far as Muslim militants are concerned, they do not care whether they are called terrorists, radical Islamists, brutes, uncivilised, or any such phrases.

There are good reasons for all, including Americans, to criticise when Muslim militants openly and deliberately violate the laws of war. Destroying ancient temples, Sufi shrines, ramming trucks into civilian crowds, bombing cities, and threatening nuclear holocaust, all these and other acts are condemnable. Muslims are obligated to openly and unreservedly condemn when Muslim militants commit such atrocities that have nothing to do with any version of Islam.

Finally, bringing God into the fight is ill-advised. For centuries, God is presented as a sponsor of violence and warfare. Trump has ruled out the possibility that God is indifferent to human wars and that God does not condone or take part in cluster bombings, drone attacks, or the use of nuclear weapons against any cities. As global citizens we need to have a sober minded look at what constitutes and causes radicalism instead of harping bellicose rhetoric that has the potential to divide the global populace and deepen hatred between races and religions.

Catch Solly Rakgomo @73904141

Subscribe to our Newsletter
Banners
Banners
Banners


Global Politics
Fri 27 Jan 2017, 15:57 pm
Fri 20 Jan 2017, 14:28 pm
Fri 13 Jan 2017, 15:27 pm
Fri 23 Dec 2016, 12:18 pm
Fri 16 Dec 2016, 16:48 pm
Fri 09 Dec 2016, 15:05 pm
Fri 02 Dec 2016, 15:49 pm
Fri 25 Nov 2016, 17:36 pm
Fri 18 Nov 2016, 14:38 pm
Fri 11 Nov 2016, 15:25 pm
Fri 04 Nov 2016, 18:40 pm
Fri 28 Oct 2016, 16:07 pm
Fri 21 Oct 2016, 18:47 pm
Fri 07 Oct 2016, 11:14 am
Wed 28 Sep 2016, 16:04 pm
Fri 23 Sep 2016, 16:03 pm
Fri 16 Sep 2016, 15:04 pm
Fri 09 Sep 2016, 14:45 pm
Fri 02 Sep 2016, 14:55 pm
Fri 26 Aug 2016, 14:56 pm
Fri 19 Aug 2016, 11:14 am
Fri 12 Aug 2016, 17:35 pm
Fri 05 Aug 2016, 12:19 pm
Fri 29 Jul 2016, 10:03 am
Fri 22 Jul 2016, 12:53 pm
Banners
Banners
Subscribe to our Newsletter
have a story? Send us a Tip
Banners
  • Previous
    Next
    Masa Centre
    ::: Sunday 18 Aug - Sunday 18 Aug :::
  • Previous
    X-Men: Dark Phoenix
    Next
    Riverwalk
    ::: Monday 17 Jun - Saturday 17 Jun :::
    X-Men: Dark Phoenix
  • Previous
    Next
    Gamecity
    ::: Sunday 18 Aug - Sunday 18 Aug :::
Selefu
O rekisa lefatshe
Banners

gramstalker

Banners