Opinion & Analysis

Announcement Of Adjustments Of Salaries, Allowances And Conditions Of Service For Certain Categories Of Employees In The Public Service

l This adjustment means that, yet again, Government moves to adjust salaries for a certain section of the Public Service (non – unionised) and leaves out another (the unionised) for the second financial year running.

l We note as well that this is done under a flimsy excuse that there is a restraining order that prohibits Government from adjusting the salaries and related allowances of public servants who are members of Unions admitted into the Public Service Bargaining Council (PSBC).

l We view the reason used at four above as distortion of facts and outright half untruths meant to mislead the public. In fact, Court has restrained unilateral increments and directed that Government is bound by law to take any proposed increment to the PSBC.

l The public and workers in general should note that this is the route (to bargain as ordered by the Courts) that Government does not want to take.

l  This action by Government comes hardly four (4) months after Government refused to bargain at the PSBC under the pretext that the Courts are still seized with a matter that would determine the scope of PSBC 8. BOFEPUSU then, and it is still our conviction even now, felt that the issue of the scope though before the Courts, should not bottle down the negotiation process as it was merely an interpretation issue for the operations of the council going forward.

l Government remained steadfast that they would only continue with the negotiations if

l Faced with the above predicament, BOFEPUSU opted to pursue the case rather than opting to negotiate.

l The public and workers in general should note that, central to the issue that was heard by Justice Motswagole of which judgement is awaited, was whether the outcome of the PSBC should affect all the public servants, or only those whose Unions are admitted into the PSBC, and as such, one would safely say that this matter of whether to increase for the non-unionised outside the PSBC or not is a matter which the Courts are still seized with.

l We are surprised and taken aback by the fact that Government has now somersaulted and decided to increase salaries and allowances for the non-unionised employees, delving into a matter that is central to the arguments of the case of the scope of the PSBC that is still before the Courts, and, which they, themselves used as a basis for refusal to bargain.

l We find this conduct by Government not only inconsistent, but also malicious, resembling bad intentions, and reminiscent of hypocrisy of the worst order.

l We note that the Permanent Secretary to the President, Cater Morupisi made this erratic and outrageous pronouncement contrary to established procedure that the Director of DPSM would make such.

In his power-mongering act, Morupisi has usurped the powers of the DPSM and sidelined Maphorisa who is the Director of DPSM.

l This confirms our long held fears that Morupisi is the one who misled Government on issues of the PSBC and public service in general.

He precipitated divisions within the public service and he is the reason for the low moral in the public service. Morupisi is imprinting a regrettable legacy of a divided and demoralised civil service.

Under his tenure as Director of DPSM and PSP, we have witnessed regression, nepotism, maladministration and rising institutionalised corruption.

It is clear that Morupisi is responsible for the current mess in the public service and therefore not fit for office.

He should voluntarily resign, failing which we call on the President to relieve him of his duties.

l Our honest opinion is that Government has allowed itself to be misled by one man, Cater Morupisi, who is the sole reason for the low morale in the public service.

l All these events have the potential to destabilise the peace and tranquility of Botswana. We would like to urge Batswana to take Government to task over this action.

l As a way forward, we have consulted our attorneys whom we have instructed to file an urgent application to interdict the current unilateral salary increment, to wait for determination of the Court so that the Council can be given a chance to deal with the salary negotiations and conditions as per the mandate of the PSBC.

Thank you, Yours in struggle,

*Tobokani Nicholas Rari,

Secretary General,  BOFEPUSU

l This adjustment means that, yet again, Government moves to adjust salaries for a certain section of the Public Service (non – unionised) and leaves out another (the unionised) for the second financial year running.

l We note as well that this is done under a flimsy excuse that there is a restraining order that prohibits Government from adjusting the salaries and related allowances of public servants who are members of Unions admitted into the Public Service Bargaining Council (PSBC).

l We view the reason used at four above as distortion of facts and outright half untruths meant to mislead the public. In fact, Court has restrained unilateral increments and directed that Government is bound by law to take any proposed increment to the PSBC.

l The public and workers in general should note that this is the route (to bargain as ordered by the Courts) that Government does not want to take.

l  This action by Government comes hardly four (4) months after Government refused to bargain at the PSBC under the pretext that the Courts are still seized with a matter that would determine the scope of PSBC 8. BOFEPUSU then, and it is still our conviction even now, felt that the issue of the scope though before the Courts, should not bottle down the negotiation process as it was merely an interpretation issue for the operations of the council going forward.

l Government remained steadfast that they would only continue with the negotiations if

l Faced with the above predicament, BOFEPUSU opted to pursue the case rather than opting to negotiate.

l The public and workers in general should note that, central to the issue that was heard by Justice Motswagole of which judgement is awaited, was whether the outcome of the PSBC should affect all the public servants, or only those whose Unions are admitted into the PSBC, and as such, one would safely say that this matter of whether to increase for the non-unionised outside the PSBC or not is a matter which the Courts are still seized with.

l We are surprised and taken aback by the fact that Government has now somersaulted and decided to increase salaries and allowances for the non-unionised employees, delving into a matter that is central to the arguments of the case of the scope of the PSBC that is still before the Courts, and, which they, themselves used as a basis for refusal to bargain.

l We find this conduct by Government not only inconsistent, but also malicious, resembling bad intentions, and reminiscent of hypocrisy of the worst order.

l We note that the Permanent Secretary to the President, Cater Morupisi made this erratic and outrageous pronouncement contrary to established procedure that the Director of DPSM would make such.

In his power-mongering act, Morupisi has usurped the powers of the DPSM and sidelined Maphorisa who is the Director of DPSM.

l This confirms our long held fears that Morupisi is the one who misled Government on issues of the PSBC and public service in general.

He precipitated divisions within the public service and he is the reason for the low moral in the public service. Morupisi is imprinting a regrettable legacy of a divided and demoralised civil service.

Under his tenure as Director of DPSM and PSP, we have witnessed regression, nepotism, maladministration and rising institutionalised corruption.

It is clear that Morupisi is responsible for the current mess in the public service and therefore not fit for office.

He should voluntarily resign, failing which we call on the President to relieve him of his duties.

l Our honest opinion is that Government has allowed itself to be misled by one man, Cater Morupisi, who is the sole reason for the low morale in the public service.

l All these events have the potential to destabilise the peace and tranquility of Botswana. We would like to urge Batswana to take Government to task over this action.

l As a way forward, we have consulted our attorneys whom we have instructed to file an urgent application to interdict the current unilateral salary increment, to wait for determination of the Court so that the Council can be given a chance to deal with the salary negotiations and conditions as per the mandate of the PSBC.

Thank you, Yours in struggle,

*Tobokani Nicholas Rari,

Secretary General,  BOFEPUSU