One cannot serve two unalike masters�

L M Leteane | Friday September 26, 2014 17:17

‘OE’), which in turn ostensibly originated from Latin: magus (great, all-encompassing [one]). In my own Protolanguage Dictionary, mo-aka (aka being as in aka-retsa: ‘encompass’) – later, mogaka – is indeed cognate with m’agus.

Going even further into Proto-Indo-European (PIE), I associate the term mazda, as in Ahura-Mazda, with masheta in proto-Tswana (great, powerful). Ahura-Mazda, the ‘God of Light’ in Zoroastrianism, I suggest, is actually ‘[He of the] Powerful Aura’, a Master of Light indeed. In our material plane of existence, i.e. Earth, an aura is felt but cannot seen – exactly like ora in Setswana (‘feel the radiance – e.g. ‘heat’ – even from a distance away’). An aura (also called a halo) was well-known in Christian tradition and was routinely depicted as a circle of radiance around Jesus’ head but, as with other once well-used Gnostic terms now deemed ‘occult’ in nature, was later suppressed. This week, we begin to explore whether Bahaullah was indeed a God-sent Master whose coming fulfilled the expectations of many religions. Christians awaited the return of Christ ‘in the glory of the Father’; Zoroastrians the return of Shah Bahram Varjavand; Shi’ite Muslims the return of Imam Husayn (their Third Imam); Sunni Muslims the return of Jesus (Prophet Isa), and Babis (followers of ‘the Bab’, Siyyid Mirza Ali-Muhammad) awaited ‘He whom God shall manifest’.

Although only implied by Bahaullah himself, Abdu’l-Baha later stated that Bahaullah was the Kalki avatar – the tenth and final Avatar (incarnation) of Vishnu who will come to end Kali Yuga, the Age of Darkness and Destruction. Baha’is also believe that Bahaullah is the prophesied Maitreya Buddha – a Buddha (‘Awakened One’), who was to eventually appear on Earth and achieve, then teach, complete enlightenment.  As a starting point to our investigation, we can divide the above into two groups, based on clues ‘hidden in plain sight’ within Mesopotamian lore. Firstly, religions propagated by Enlil (EN.L’ILLU: ‘Lord of the Gods, the Illu’), are evidently Judaism, Pauline Christianity, Islam, and the Baha’i faith, and, secondly, those revealed and elucidated by Thoth (Tehuti) – a fellow ‘god’ belonging to the rival clan of EN.KI (‘Lord of Earth’) are namely: Zoroastrianism, Buddhism, Confucianism, Shintoism, Taoism, Jainism, what I would call ‘Revised Hinduism’ (one that had a different, more mystical eschatology than the Vedic worship of ‘Maruts’, the gods), and Gnostic Christianity. What separates these two?

Basically, Enlil’s line was, and is, that of ‘obedience to God’ through certain rules of conduct and worship as crystalized in ‘revealed’ (‘Holy’) Books written or dictated by ‘God’s prophets’. The books are taken to be the very Word of God. The newest of these religions, the Baha’i faith, was primed and scheduled for 1844, the ‘End of Days’, with the ultimate aim of creating a harmonious society on Earth and, eventually, one monotheistic religion. Regardless, it is very easy to see that the original, detailed, Mesopotamian stories about Enlil – and later his son Su-en/Aten (‘Adonis’ in Greek, ‘Adonai’ in Hebrew, ‘Al-at’ in Arabic – all meaning ‘Multiplying God’) – are the same stories later attributed to the God of Israel.

How can we know that the ‘Wisdom-God’ Thoth (Hermes in Greek, thus also called ‘Herma-Thoth’) began the second set of religions? In a prior article, I showed in more detail how, post -562 BC, they suddenly sprang up in Asia, in the time of Daniel, just after Su-en’s Enlilite clan (see above) had famously defeated Herma-Thoth – an Enkiite – in South America, where the latter was known as Viracocha (Mayan) or Quetzalcoatl (Aztec). Herma-Thoth escaped exile in Jaina (an island off Mexico, after which ‘Jainism’ is named) and fled to the ‘Herma-Laya’ mountains – also named after him because ‘Thoth’ is an Anglicization of te-huti (mo-ruti – ‘teacher’ – in modern Setswana), and laya is ‘teach’; therefore, ‘Herma-thoth’ and ‘Herma-laya’ both mean ‘Hermes the Teacher’. It was thus in BC 562, that a New World Order blueprint was revealed to a shaken, traumatized Daniel (see Dan. 7:28; 8:27, etc.), and a pitched battle for people’s souls evidently began.

I have strenuously explained, in prior articles, that the ‘gods’ were actually advanced flesh-and-blood beings of extremely advanced technology; whose stupendously ancient origins – periodically uncovered in fossil records as old as 300 million years – are secretly off-limits to archaeologists (see Forbidden Archaeology by Michael A. Cremo and Richard L. Thompson).

Evidently, circa BC 2024, to avert future rivalry over people’s loyalty to them – which tensions boiled over into nuclear disaster in Abraham’s time as exposed in the Khudurlaomar Texts and the Erra-Opos (the biblical version is heavily abbreviated and falsified) – they decided to blend in innocently with people, yet rule us unseen, which is why Jesus called them Ma-amun (‘Unseen Ones’; the term amun (ha-o-mmone in Setswana) is well-known to philologists). The true linguistic explanation of mammon was, I can thus reveal, deliberately obscured.

Ultimately, then, per Jesus (Matthew. 6:24), you cannot serve two masters – ma-amun (mammon) and God proper – as these are not the same entity. Indeed, as I carefully explained in prior articles, the Word in Gnosticism (Jesus’ true teachings, and also as taught by Thoth) is a completely different Entity from the ‘Word’ as widely understood (i.e. a ‘holy book’ that is purportedly God’s own words). Next week, we revisit this essential difference – and also the difference between a Saviour and a prophet. That way, we will be able to comfortably slot Bahaullah in his proper category.

Comments to leteanelm@gmail.com