The angels that cleansed the sanctuary

L M Leteane | Friday September 5, 2014 14:07

Last week, we noted that the ‘Daniel’ blueprint had correctly anticipated that despite the 1844 Edict of Toleration that allowed them back into their Holy Land, many Jews would be reluctant to leave their businesses and properties and start afresh in another land. So, the Laodicea Church spirit of Revelation 3:15-16 began in 1914. Judged as ‘lukewarm’, Jews were set up, through the contrivances of World War I, to be ‘spat out’ of Europe by their Lord(s). The actual ‘spitting out’ took place in World War II.

In line with Leviticus 26:27ff wherein their Lord resolved to chastise them ‘seven times’, and also to spur them on, they were, like grapes in a winepress, ‘harvested’ and crushed by the millions ‘outside of the City’, in their seventh and final chastisement. Like red-grape juice, their blood “reached the horses’ bridles” (Rev.14:19-20) – their ‘ethnic cleansing’ from Europe. However, to make up for this, their Holy City, New Jerusalem (present-day Israel), their old ‘sanctuary’, was also ‘cleansed’ for them (i.e. thereafter, Palestinians were simply cleared away from there). In preparation for this, Britain – the main driver of the Daniel Blueprint – had to first take control of both Egypt and the Holy Land.

A few weeks ago, I decoded that ‘earth’, in Revelations, signified ‘standing ground’ – the cultures, beliefs and religions of populations – just as ‘sea’ symbolised “peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues” (Rev. 17:15).  This duly noted, we can better understand the events described in Rev. 14:14-20. Here, an angel emerged from the Temple, and commanded “one like unto the Son of Man”, who sat on a white cloud, to, firstly, “thrust in [his] sharp sickle into the earth…and the earth was reaped”.

The ‘angel’ evidently refers to a Power mandated to direct the ‘harvesting of the ground’ – the fulfilling of the religions expectations of people – through the ‘return’ of a Jesus-like figure. Who was this figure? It had to be Baha’u’llah – and the ‘white cloud’ referred to his lofty, peaceful teachings just as the ‘white horse’ of the Ephesus Church spirit (Rev. 6:2) referred to Paul’s new, non-violent approach to proselytization after his ‘Damascus’ experience.

In 1844, in Persia (now Iran), a figure known as ‘the Bab’ (‘the gateway’) announced his ‘divine mandate’: to prepare the way for one ‘whom God shall make manifest’. In that very year, his missives recruited Baha’u’llah when he was just 27 years old. When, in 1850, the Persian government executed the Bab by firing squad at only 30 years old, he had already appointed someone, Mirzah Yahya, to nominally lead his followers, the extermination-threatened ‘Babis’. At least until the ‘Promised One’ emerged.

Indeed, it was only in 1852, while imprisoned in the ‘Black Pit’ dungeons of Tehran, that Baha’u’llah ‘received a divine revelation from a Maiden of God’ – his real start-point as a ‘Messenger of God’ and ‘the fulfilment of the awaited return, in many religions, of a Great One who will usher in a period of Godly knowledge’. He thus called the years from 1852 to 1863 – when he at last revealed his divine mission to a select few in the Garden of Ridvan – as the necessary ‘Days of Concealment’. We will discuss Baha’u’llah and his Baha’i faith in more detail next week. Right now, it is clear that John’s ‘angel’ had to be a Power able to covertly control, through the Ottoman Empire, Persia herself; one – we have seen – intimately acquainted with the Daniel Blueprint. Britain.

With the ‘earth’ thus prepared (in more ways than one), the ‘vine of the earth’, with its grapes, was ready to be harvested. This, I explained, referred to the Jews. The ‘vine’ is the long and tangled religious history of the Chosen Ones – a religion carefully nurtured to promote and epitomise ‘monotheism’ – and the Jews themselves were the ‘grapes’ that clustered, grew on, and hung onto, this ‘vine’.

Adolph Hitler’s proselytising ‘horse’, Nazism, whipped up hateful propaganda against Jews, then ‘trod on them’ in one of the cruellest exterminations of a people ever seen. The fact that their ‘crushing’ was ‘outside of the City’ means that it took place well outside the Holy Land: in Europe. Hitler, then, is arguably the ‘second angel’ of Rev. 14:17 who also had a sharp sickle in his hand. He, too, came out of the Temple – but the one ‘in heaven’. The term ‘heaven’, here, is loaded.

As discernible from my above etymology, the AN.ELs (angels), are proud and mindful that they are ‘gods’ who came down from the ‘heavens’, outer space, in a distant, bygone age. Sumerian and many other legends are clear on this. Hitler was thus a representative, a minion, of these Illi (plural of Illu), now the Illuminati (a term whose true origins are widely misunderstood).

But who was the third angel who orders the second angel to ‘harvest’ the Jews? Significantly, this ‘angel’ comes from the ‘altar’ itself – indicating an Illuminati member close to the ultimate centre of power. It was, in general terms, Germany – but, specifically, Dietrich Eckart, a shadowy dramatist known to have mentored Hitler; who taught him the striking poses, the fiery speeches and, no doubt, the glamorised account of a ‘fabulous time’ when only the gods, the Illu, the Shining Ones, ruled the Earth in the time of Thule and Atlantis. He found, in Hitler, an attentive, well-chosen student. The rest is history.

Comments to leteanelm@gmail.com