Behind the image of power and glory

L M Leteane | Thursday April 17, 2014 10:05

As my near-seamless Truth-Matrix further exposes, bitter rivalry between the clans culminated in the Sodom and Gomorrah nuclear disaster that generated an “Evil Wind” (radiation) that brought Sumer (now Iraq) to her knees – causing the gods to flee to Europe en masse. This event forced the Elohim to unite. Resolving to henceforth rule unseen, they used their technology to project themselves as the Unseen God, the real God, under the convenient banner of “monotheism” – which ideology they dedicated to the emerging Age of Aries (BC 2160 to AD 0). Marduk, (Baal), the “god” of Babylon – the eldest son of Enki, founder of the Enkiite clan – refused to join this scheme and was promptly labelled a “false” god.

As Is. 46:1 and Jer. 50:2 crowed triumphantly, Marduk and his son Nebo were eventually forced to compromise, and his younger brother Ningishziddha (Thoth) was defeated in South America – where he was known as the Aztec god Quetzalcoatl. Although the Old Testament (OT) contains subtle, creeping changes not there in the original Hebrew bible, much older Mesopotamian texts like the Khedeolaomar Texts and the Erra Opos show the war between Marduk and the Enlilites to be historical fact. Newer OT translations have, however, subtly changed the originally “withered” Marduk and his “cowed” son Nabu (Nebo) to lifeless idols and statues: “Marduk (Bel) bows down, Nebo stoops over, their images (statues) given over to (trampled on by) beasts…” (New American Standard Bible) – as if these characters were the statues themselves. Was Saddam Hussein a fictitious idol just because his statues were either torn down or became defunct? Is. 50:2 nevertheless speaks, correctly, of Marduk as having been “put to shame”…

Having won, the Enlilites wasted no time in confidently drawing up the far-sighted Daniel blueprint – the main feature of which was to slyly continue the Seven Chastisements of the Jews through the “prophesied” rise and fall of empires. This left Thoth alone to counter this blueprint. He fled to the Hima-layas and founded not only the buntu religions of the East: Shinto (se-ntu), Buddhism (buddha is “open/ awaken”: bula in Setswana), Jainism, Taoism, and Zoroastrianism (see previous articles for more details on this), but the Nahashin as well (Hebrew: Wise Men, the “Nazarenes”); Enkiites subjects who were em-bedded in Qumran, twenty miles east of Jerusalem.

As things were coming to a head and a “renewal” of faith was projected for the new Age of Pisces (AD 0 to 2160), the Nahashin intercepted Jesus at birth and later whisked him away to teach him the buntu religions of the East that Herma-Thoth had started there circa BC 562. Jesus thus rejected the Messiah role prepared for him per Dan. 9: 26-7 whereby, using the initially unwitting Paul, he was to be slyly blamed for, in Jewish eyes, ushering in the “abomination” of making the sanctuary “bare” (devoid of sac-rifice). Mainly through Hebrews (an epistle, per scholars, Paul appears not to have written; to which, per-haps, he ultimately wanted no part of), Jesus was touted the “sacrifice to end all sacrifices”.

Paul’s Enlilite role was to kill off Stephan (S’tab-Aan: “stub” (counterpart) of John (Aan) the Baptist) and usurp his role as John (Aan) the Scribe – one of the Two Witnesses of a Saviour – thus stripping away Jesus’ Gnostic teachings and indeed leaving the Messiah “with nothing”. To counter this, the En-kiites groomed a new Aan the Scribe – John the Revelator – mainly to “unseal” (expose) the Daniel blue-print. So, just as Paul wrote to seven different churches he had established in Europe and Asia Minor: in Ephesus, Corinth, Colossi, Rome, Galatia, Philippi and Thessalonica, John countered by writing to seven churches in Asia (Ephesus being the only one common to both), each time warning the “saints” (“Elect”) there not to be deceived. Indeed, perhaps wary of Herma-Thoth’s, influence in Asia, Paul had not man-aged to sway much of the continent (2 Tim. 1:15).

From next week, we will again pick up the thread of unbundling the Seven Spirits of the Churches and their accompanying Four Horses, Seven Trumpets and Plagues, and Two Woes. Nevertheless, we can make an immediate comparison between Thyatira – the Fourth Spirit of the Churches – and Acts 16:14 which describes a certain Lydia as a “seller of purple” (a royal colour). Both Lydia (“Jezebel” of Rev. 2:20) and the Church encapsulated – as we shall duly explain in more detail – the selling out of the “royal” (Gnostic) message of Jesus; the Church of Rome instead donning the “purple” of immense tempo-ral power. Indeed, Lydia is the very region where money was first minted as we will duly explain.

Comments to leteanelm@gmail.com