BDP constitution review calls face procedural test
Tsaone Basimanebotlhe | Monday March 9, 2026 09:48
While members have increasingly voiced the need for a review, especially during the recent retreat, the constitution itself outlines strict procedures that must be followed before any amendments can become binding. Last weekend, BDP members once again pushed for a constitution review, arguing that the party must evolve to remain relevant and responsive. Despite the growing chorus, the process is neither automatic nor informal. On the contrary, it is carefully regulated. In fact, the party constitution makes it explicit that binding decisions cannot simply emerge from retreats or informal gatherings. Instead, such decisions must pass through established structures, particularly the National Council. This requirement is not merely procedural; it is constitutional. Article 28.3 clearly states that the Central Committee (CC) has the power to determine party policy, but only within the framework of decisions taken by the National Council and/or National Congress.
In other words, while the CC plays a significant leadership role, its authority is anchored in resolutions formally adopted by higher decision-making bodies. Therefore, any meaningful constitutional reform must ultimately be sanctioned through such channels. Furthermore, Article 42.1 provides a direct and structured pathway for those seeking amendments. It stipulates that any member, committee, or organ of the party may propose changes to the constitution or regulations. However, such proposals must be submitted in writing to the Executive Secretary no later than four calendar months before the next meeting of the National Council.
Again, it states: ”the secretary general of the party shall immediately, certainly not later than three months prior to the next meeting of the National Council, cause to be sent to each branch committee and regional committee of the party proposed amendment. Each branch and each region shall hold a congress to inter alia, and consider the proposed amendment in preparation for the National Council”.
It also said the proposed amendments shall be placed on the agenda of the next party National Congress, whether ordinary or special, debated, and shall be made only if accepted and approved by no less than two-thirds of the members of the national congress present and voting.
Furthermore, it says the only amendments complying with this procedure, or variations thereof arising in the course of debate, may be made; and amendments shall take effect immediately unless the postponement of their operation shall have been a condition of their approval, in which event the date of their commencement shall be expressly stated by the National Congress making the amendment.
Additionally, the constitution further states that an extraordinary national congress, the provision of clause 1 of this article shall be deemed to have been complied with if: “At least one month of the proposed amendments is given to members of the National Council, and at least 24 hours’ notice is given to delegates of the national congress,” it says.