Boko faces BNF test
Tsaone Basimanebotlhe | Monday July 14, 2025 10:02
This year’s congress not only marks another chapter in the Puo-Phaa’s political calendar but also reignites internal debates surrounding Boko’s leadership and the party’s direction under his stewardship. Since assuming the presidency in 2010 during the Mochudi congress, Boko has undeniably left a mark on the political landscape.
For instance, his ascension brought a fresh and energetic vibe to the opposition, one that many credited for revitalising the BNF’s image and appeal.
Over the years, he has remained a central figure in opposition politics, capturing attention both within his party and on the national stage.
Now, as the BNF prepares to elect its new leadership, Boko is poised for a fourth endorsement as party president, this time unchallenged.
Unlike previous congresses where he faced opposition from within, this year no contender has stepped forward to challenge his leadership.
On the surface, this might suggest widespread support, but beneath that calm exterior lies a simmering discontent over his governance approach and the direction in which he is steering the party.
The BNF constitution mandates that an elective congress be held every three years, providing members an opportunity to review leadership performance and recalibrate the party’s strategies.
While Boko’s unopposed candidacy may seem like a vote of confidence, insiders argue that it reflects more on internal fatigue, division, and an absence of alternative leadership than it does on his effectiveness.
One of the most pressing concerns raised by party members is Boko’s alleged detachment from internal party affairs, particularly his handling or lack thereof, of the central committee (CC).
Over the past few years, tensions within the BNF have escalated, with some members blaming Boko for the CC’s failure to function effectively.
Complicating the situation, Mmegi has learnt that Boko has not attended a single CC meeting this year, reportedly due to “government commitments.”
This absence has sparked a wave of criticism, especially from those who argue that the party cannot operate efficiently without regular central committee engagements.
For an organisation such as the BNF, which prides itself on collective leadership and democratic engagement, the non-attendance raises serious concerns about accountability and commitment.
Throughout different congresses, Boko has repeatedly appealed to members to elect leaders he can work with and individuals who would allow him to focus more on the Umbrella for Democratic Change (UDC), the opposition coalition which he also leads in government.
His rationale is that strengthening the UDC is crucial for the broader opposition cause. Yet, this argument has not been universally accepted within the BNF. Many within the party remain skeptical, contending that Boko is sidelining the BNF in favour of the UDC.
According to critics, this approach undermines the very organisation that gave Boko his platform. They argue that the BNF, as his political home, should remain his primary focus, while the UDC should be considered a secondary responsibility.
The heart of the matter lies in a fundamental difference of opinion: While some members support Boko’s strategic focus on coalition politics through the UDC, others feel increasingly alienated and voiceless within the BNF itself.
They question how a party can be expected to contribute meaningfully to a coalition if its own internal machinery is barely functional.
The recent five-day political education workshop, facilitated by members of the African National Congress (ANC) from South Africa, further exposed the cracks within the BNF.
During the training, ANC representatives cautioned BNF leadership about the dangers of prioritising external or governmental responsibilities at the expense of internal party matters.
However, in an interview with the party chairperson, Dr Patrick Molutsi on Wednesday, he said: “This year we had agreed as the CC that the President will be called to attend the meetings when necessary. Again, some issues are internal. The person who was delegated to be in charge of the party, is Dr. Micus Chimbombi but unfortunately our vice president is not well as you may know. That does not mean the party does not take crucial issues that need him to his table, and he does give guidance on them. Again, he is the President of the country and UDC.”
Furthermore, he said the reason why the vice president is delegated to run the affairs of the party was for CC to be able to hold its meeting with or without the President and he gets briefed about decisions that are taken.
In addition, he said the President does intervene where necessary, but most issues are dealt with at structural level or taken to CC where necessary.
Meanwhile, on the issue of compromise on teams contesting for party positions, Dr. Molutsi said the issue has not failed as the President is intending to meet the leaders of the teams.
“This issue is going to be dealt with by the President. The President wants peace and unity. He is concerned with the way things are turning out,” he said.
As the BNF heads into congress, the spotlight is not only on who gets elected but also on whether the party can reclaim its internal cohesion and direction.
The ANC's input served as both a lesson and a mirror, reflecting the need for introspection and institutional discipline.
It is worth noting that the BNF’s internal challenges are not unique in Botswana’s political space. Many parties wrestle with balancing coalition commitments and individual party identities. However, for a party as historically significant as the BNF, the stakes are higher.
The BNF has long been regarded as a torchbearer for progressive politics and grassroots activism. The perception that its leadership is drifting away from its core principles poses a threat not just to its relevance, but to its legacy.
As the congress draws closer, it remains to be seen whether the BNF will use the opportunity to reset and rejuvenate.