Mmegi

Council hopefuls withdraw case against BDP

The activists had cited the BDP before withdrawing the matter PIC: KENNEDY RAMOKONE
The activists had cited the BDP before withdrawing the matter PIC: KENNEDY RAMOKONE

FRANCISTOWN: Four Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) activists in the Tonota constituency have withdrawn their application to bar the ruling party from fielding some council candidates to contest in the upcoming General Election.

The four applicants are Botho Ntirang, Gaobewe Kasale, Moagi Modipane and Jacob Oduetse. The quartet cited the BDP, Peter Gaonabeng, Moses Mochabo, Tebogo Donovan, Moagi Khumo, and the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC) as respondents in the application. Gaonabeng, Mochabo, Donovan and Khumo had defeated the applicants in various wards in the recent BDP primary elections. The gripe of the quartet was that the ruling party didn't address their queries after they lost in the primaries despite numerous written communications to the BDP to address them. When the matter was supposed to be argued on Friday, the quartet, through their attorney Gontse Simon, said they confirmed that they had been served with papers opposing their application by the respondents’ attorneys.

“After going through the papers and content therein, we found that it is proper to withdraw this application mostly on account that the applicants no longer enjoy the membership of the BDP. “However, we communicated with the respondents’ attorneys that we won't pay costs as a general rule, but the respondents’ attorneys don't agree with that. We came to the conclusion that a date should be set to argue the issue of costs,” said Simon. Drama ensued before the case started when the respondents’ attorneys, Bogopa, Manewe, Tobedza and Company Attorneys, served the applicants with letters of suspension from the BDP signed by President Mokgweetsi Masisi. The quartet sensed that they had no prospects of success against Masisi because of the provisions of Section 41 (1) of the Constitution of Botswana (Protection of President in respect of legal proceedings). It reads: (1) Whilst any person holds or performs the functions of the office of President no criminal proceedings shall be instituted or continued against him or her in respect of anything done or omitted to be done by him or her either in his or her official capacity or in his or her private capacity and no civil proceedings shall be instituted or continued in respect of which relief is claimed against him or her in respect of anything done or omitted to be done in his or her private capacity.

Editor's Comment
No room for perjury

It seems some government accounting officers, sworn to tell "the truth, the whole truth, and nothing else but the truth" before Almighty God, may have deliberately lied during the committee’s vital work. If proven, this is not merely unprofessional; it is perjury, a serious criminal offence and it strikes at the very heart of responsible government.The PAC’s role is fundamental. After each financial year, it painstakingly examines how public...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up