The most divisive issue currently shaking the party is the leadership’s proposal for a compromise model between lobby lists, a suggestion that has sparked frustration and resistance amongst many members. Although the party leadership has presented the idea of a compromise as a means of preventing potential destabilisation, members on the ground appear unconvinced. They argue that the model threatens to undermine internal democracy, a right they have long held and a tradition protected by the party’s constitution. Through various internal WhatsApp groups and ongoing grassroots campaign discussions, it has become apparent that many members feel strongly that any attempt to interfere with the electoral process will erode accountability and fairness within the party. The BNF, an affiliate of the Umbrella for Democratic Change (UDC), is preparing for its elective congress, scheduled for July this year. However, recent statements made by the leadership suggesting the need for harmony between contesting teams have been met with skepticism.
While the leadership’s concerns about party unity are not without merit, grassroots members feel that the remedy should not come at the cost of their democratic rights. According to one insider familiar with these conversations, the resistance stems largely from a desire for clear accountability. "It is true members are not supportive of a compromise as they believe they want people whom they could hold accountable. Their view is that if the president interferes in the affairs of the party, then when he has a dispute with office bearers or when they fail to deliver, the members will blame him," the source said. Despite that, discussions among members indicate that internal campaigning has remained respectful and issue-based. In various leaked conversations, members revealed that while there are differences in opinions and preferences during campaigns, those divisions typically dissolve after elections. However, members' view are that the competition is temporary and unity resumes once the leadership is elected. It is clearer that this belief fuels their argument that a compromise is unnecessary and potentially damaging to the internal democracy. Some members have also pointed out that the BNF has clearly outlined disciplinary procedures in place to deal with any behaviour that encourages unhealthy factionalism. Instead, they advocate for the continuation of open contests, with the assurance that unity can and will be restored afterward. In addition to the resistance towards a compromise, many members are expressing a desire for a stronger and more active Central Committee (CC). They argue that the party is in urgent need of leadership that is not only competent but also present and engaged with its membership.
