Latest News

Botswana National Front Central Committee (BNFCC) over the weekend res...
Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has raised a concern over the rising n...
Botswana Prisons Service has committed to start a video conferencing f...
The High Court has for the second time interdicted the Botswana Red Cr...

CoA comes to SB's rescue

Stats Botswana headquarters
The Court of Appeal (CoA) has saved Statistics Botswana (SB) from financial collapse that could have resulted in paying aggrieved employees as per earlier High Court judgement.

Employees represented by Botswana Public Employees Union (BOPEU) had taken the employer to court over pay disparity.

Following the determination of the matter at the High Court in November 2016, SB appealed to CoA seeking the court to set aside the judgement.

The judgement had declared that the organisation’s disparity in the pay structure of employees where employees doing the same job at the same level and holding same or similar qualifications was unlawful.

The judgement also ordered that employees performing the same functions at the same level of operation, duties and having same or similar qualifications be declared entitled to the same remuneration.

Justice Singh Walia of the CoA however, agreed to set aside the judgement and allowed the matter to be taken back to the High Court for continuation before a different judge.

Walia said it was so because despite the parties having approached CoA prepared for a bruising encounter, they had agreed at last that the judgement of the court a quo could not be allowed to stand as the Judge had made an error making determination on a matter that was not before him. “It is not necessary to traverse the argument before us on the rationale for remitting the matter, save to say that the court a quo had proceeded to rule on matters not before it and failed to rule on the matter properly before it. In effect therefore, there was no hearing at all,” he said.

In dealing with BOPEU’s argument that a proper action for SB to have taken was to have made an application for rescission of the judgement granted in error, Walia said they were in support of Statistics’ reasoning.

Statistics had argued that application for rescission would have been a fruitless exercise since the matter would have

gone to the same forum that had wrongly made the original decision on the merits. Further, SB had submitted that the court a quo was in error in concluding that both parties had accepted the judgement.

Walia questioned why there was a need for clarification about the judgement if both parties had acquiesced to the judgement.

“The papers before us support the SB’s contention in every way. It was only at the hearing of the appeal that BOPEU admitted that the judgement had been granted in error and that the only remedy was for the matter to be remitted for re-hearing.”

Walia went on to deal a heavy blow to the employees and their union when he agreed with SB to have the cost of the appeal saying it was quite clear that BOPEU’s attitude compelled them to run with the full process of appeal when an early realisation and acceptance of the inevitable would have saved each party time and expenses.

SB was appealing the judgement mainly because they felt wrongful done by, by the court a quo and they were fearing financial collapse if they had to abide by the court order to pay the employees despite agreeing that the disparity in the pay structure was due to an error and were willing to rectify the mistake.

The organisation argued that the Judge rushed to give the judgement without determining the application, which was only on the preliminary issue of whether or not the court’s jurisdiction was ousted by the parties’ Collective Labour Agreement.

Also, SB argued that the court did not properly consider the applicant’s proposal to close the difference in payment that was being complained of and did not consider that the order was going to result in their financial collapse.


Banners ?>


Kwa Botswana ke fitlhetse moupudu o budule

Latest Frontpages

Todays Paper Todays Paper Todays Paper Todays Paper Todays Paper Todays Paper
Adana Escort Adıyaman Escort Afyon Escort Ağrı Escort Aksaray Escort Amasya Escort Ankara Escort Antalya Escort Antep Escort Ardahan Escort Artvin Escort Aydın Escort Balıkesir Escort Bartın Escort Batman Escort Bayburt Escort Bilecik Escort Bingöl Escort Bitlis Escort Bolu Escort Burdur Escort Bursa Escort Çanakkale Escort Çankırı Escort Çorum Escort Denizli Escort Diyarbakır Escort Düzce Escort Edirne Escort Erzincan Escort Elazığ Escort Erzurum Escort Eskişehir Escort Giresun Escort Gümüşhane Escort Hakkari Escort Hatay Escort Iğdır Escort Isparta Escort İskenderun Escort İstanbul Escort İzmir Escort İzmit Escort Karabük Escort Karaman Escort Kars Escort Kastamonu Escort Kayseri Escort Kıbrıs Escort Kırıkkale Escort Kırklareli Escort Kırşehir Escort Kilis Escort Kocaeli Escort Konya Escort Kütahya Escort Malatya Escort Manisa Escort Maraş Escort Mardin Escort Mersin Escort Muğla Escort Muş Escort Nevşehir Escort Niğde Escort Ordu Escort Osmaniye Escort Rize Escort Sakarya Escort Samsun Escort Siirt Escort Sinop Escort Sivas Escort Şırnak Escort Tekirdağ Escort Tokat Escort Trabzon Escort Tunceli Escort Urfa Escort Uşak Escort Van Escort Yalova Escort Yozgat Escort Zonguldak Escort Alaçatı Escort Aliağa Escort Alsancak Escort Bornova Escort Buca Escort Çeşme Escort Çiğli Escort Gaziemir Escort Karşıyaka Escort fethiye escort iskenderun escort iskenderun escort iskenderun escort iskenderun escort iskenderun escort