Alright, mistakes are often made and an inappropriate word can so easily appear when something else is intended. But how should we understand that single word? Was/is the Director of the DISS really employed by and accountable to the ex-President and is he still working on his personal behalf, even after his Presidency has come to an end? I suppose that there are alternative explanations to hand, although it is hard to think of any. He is certainly not answerable to the National Assembly – as a result of its own disastrous decision some years back - which means that any claims about working in the interests of the country can never be substantiated and therefore have to be set aside. The implication of that word ’his’ does, however, suggest that the DISS has to all intents and purposes become personal property. But this may be to attach too much importance to that single word however curious its use might have been. But then there has been the surprise last minute award of the Presidential order of Honour by the then President to Director Isaac Kgosi and to the Commissioner of Police, Mr Keabetswe Makgophe. The award, said the Daily News, is given to a citizen who has rendered efficient and devoted service to Botswana. President Khama congratulated the two saying they deserved the awards because of their commitment and dedication to work for the country. He then spoke at length about the Commissioner’s achievements, but said nothing further about the contribution that the Director of the DISS had made. Curious days indeed, but can the BDP hope to win the next election if it allows the government’s security apparatus to continue hanging around its neck? But enough of that disheartening topic.
Let’s turn our attention to other single words? In passing, and for those who care for such matters, we have seen a quite extraordinary number of adjectives being applied to the ex-President during the last few weeks. With greater relevance, however, I was intrigued by the adverts congratulating the new President on his rise to power. Many, it seemed, had struggled to find the appropriate word whilst others gave up and skirted around the issue. In the end, the three most favoured words were ‘ascend’, ‘appointment’ and ‘assumption’ with that other word, ‘election; being discreetly avoided. The idea of ascending to office does have a certain appeal but is uncomfortably close to ascending to the throne. Reference to his appointment may be dead accurate, but may serve to remind readers that it only needed one person to make this appointment. In the real world, that rarely happens. The third option – ‘on assumption of office’ seems to me to be masterful with no possibility of falling off the gang plank.
