The Monitor :: Efforts to boost elephant protection fails at Cites
Banners
Banners
Banners
Banners
Last Updated
Friday 24 November 2017, 17:23 pm.
Banners
Efforts to boost elephant protection fails at Cites

Attempts to give the maximum level of international protection to all African elephants have foundered at a key species conference in Johannesburg.
By BBC.COM Tue 04 Oct 2016, 09:24 am (GMT +2)
The Monitor :: Efforts to boost elephant protection fails at Cites








A proposal put forward by Kenya was strongly supported but failed to gain the two-thirds majority required.

The opposition of the EU, which voted as a block, was pivotal in the defeat.

Other proposals that would have opened up new ivory markets were also rejected.

Proponents of the increased protection say it is a missed opportunity to safeguard the future of the species and end the current poaching crisis.

African nations have been split on the best approach to conserve elephant populations that have been reduced by around 30% over the past seven years, mainly due to poaching for ivory.

Many range states that have suffered big losses backed a resolution at this meeting that would see all elephants in every African country elevated to Cites Appendix I, meaning no trade at all is possible in these animals.

Four Southern African countries, Namibia, South Africa, Botswana and Zimbabwe have their elephants listed on Appendix II but with an annotation that prevents any trade in their ivory.

Three of them resolutely opposed the idea of an up-listing as they argue that their elephant populations are doing well and they want to renew the trade in ivory at some point in the future.

In a passionate debate, proponents of the uplisting said it was critical to send the strongest signal possible to poachers that all elephants in Africa were off limits.

Lee White, from Gabon, told the meeting that his country was "haemorrhaging" about one tonne of ivory per month as a result of poaching.

He said that one thousand African park rangers had lost their lives over the past decade in fighting against the illegal trade.

Uplisting all African elephants would send an "absolutely clear" message that the trade must stop.

Botswana made a dramatic intervention, suggesting that they would give up their Appendix II status and rejecting the idea that a

Banners

trade in ivory could raise funds to protect the species.

"We now realises that we can no longer support sales, we can no longer deal with this in a vacuum," said Tshekedi Khama, Botwana's minister for the environment, wildlife and tourism.

Other southern African states didn't agree. They argued that uplisting depended on science, and that most of the populations in the Appendix II states were growing and not deserving to be on Appendix I.

"Parties must uphold the integrity of the Convention," said South African minister Edna Molewa.

The EU also took this line, stating that the southern African elephant populations didn't meet the biological criteria for uplisting.

This opposition proved crucial: the vote was 62 in favour with 44 against and 12 abstained.

With the EU voting as a block, this meant that their 28 votes went against the proposal and denied the two thirds majority that would put all populations on Appendix I.

Some delegates were not impressed by the European Union approach.

"The fault's at the EU door here, in my view they have the blood of elephants on their hands," said Dr Roz Reeve, senior adviser to the David Shepherd Wildlife Foundation.

"I'm deeply frustrated and ashamed, if it hadn't been for the EU we'd have had elephants on Appendix I by now and that would send a massive signal to the world."

Other proposals to open up ivory markets by Namibia and Zimbabwe were also soundly defeated.

These countries argued that their elephant populations were robust and that their communities were not benefitting from these populations.

"If people are able to benefit from the ivory, they will not poach, they will protect - give us a reason to protect, not fear them," said Charles Jonga, a rural community representative from Zimbabwe.

Following a secret ballot, the Convention decided not to support the proposals.

Banners
Banners
Banners


World
Tue 04 Oct 2016, 09:24 am
Tue 13 Sep 2016, 17:04 pm
Tue 06 Sep 2016, 19:24 pm
Mon 29 Aug 2016, 16:58 pm
Tue 16 Aug 2016, 09:57 am
Tue 09 Aug 2016, 12:37 pm
Tue 05 Jul 2016, 10:48 am
Tue 21 Jun 2016, 08:27 am
Wed 04 May 2016, 10:48 am
Tue 03 May 2016, 10:09 am
Tue 12 Apr 2016, 09:17 am
Tue 05 Apr 2016, 09:37 am
Tue 22 Mar 2016, 10:20 am
Tue 01 Mar 2016, 11:15 am
Tue 23 Feb 2016, 09:07 am
Tue 16 Feb 2016, 10:43 am
Tue 09 Feb 2016, 09:33 am
Tue 19 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm
Tue 12 Jan 2016, 16:51 pm
Wed 16 Dec 2015, 12:49 pm
Mon 14 Dec 2015, 20:00 pm
Mon 07 Dec 2015, 13:05 pm
Tue 01 Dec 2015, 10:38 am
Mon 30 Nov 2015, 17:52 pm
Mon 23 Nov 2015, 16:17 pm
Banners
Banners
Exchange Rates
FOREIGN EXCHANGE: Friday, 24 Nov 2017
FOREIGN / PULA
PULA / FOREIGN
1 USD = Pula   10.4167
1 GBP = Pula   13.8504
1 EUR = Pula   12.3457
1 YEN = Pula   0.0935
1 ZAR = Pula   0.7492
1 Pula = USD   0.096
1 Pula = GBP   0.0722
1 Pula = EUR   0.081
1 Pula = YEN   10.7
1 Pula = ZAR   1.3348
have a story? Send us a Tip
Banners
  • Previous
    Next
    Masa Centre
    ::: Saturday 25 Nov - Saturday 25 Nov :::
  • Previous
    Next
    Riverwalk
    ::: Saturday 25 Nov - Saturday 25 Nov :::
  • Previous
    Next
    Gamecity
    ::: Saturday 25 Nov - Saturday 25 Nov :::
Selefu
Zimbabwe, Mugabe
Banners
Banners
istanbul escort