Why is the executive picking up quarrels and selling dummies to Batswana?

Batswana won’t tire of singing, ‘Botswana was among the first three independent African countries to embrace multiparty democracy…’ We’ve the right to beat our breasts and sing lustily.

50 years under multiparty democracy and after swaying the initially, single-party African democracies, how many Batswana can sincerely say their country is a true multiparty democracy? If the answer is none, why has the country not lived up to its design? Why is Botswana a single-party democracy in practice?

Did we mean it when we said we were a multiparty democracy? Did we only wish it or did we change our (collective) mind as the years went by? What happened? Did the party that won the first general elections, the Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) alias Domkrag, after tasting the tastiness of power, revise its creed and decide that single party democracy was a delicacy not to be shared with others? Or was it the BDP rivals, the opposition who decided, that fulfilling the promise of government of the people by the people for the people, was beyond their capacity and therefore they had to be steady and content instead of vigorously striving for power? Could it be that the opposition were never able to learn the art of wrestling power from pretenders? 

Editor's Comment
Inspect the voters' roll!

The recent disclosure by the IEC that 2,513 registrations have been turned down due to various irregularities should prompt all Batswana to meticulously review the voters' rolls and address concerns about rejected registrations.The disparities flagged by the IEC are troubling and emphasise the significance of rigorous voter registration processes.Out of the rejected registrations, 29 individuals were disqualified due to non-existent Omang...

Have a Story? Send Us a tip
arrow up